Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K
https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/us-supreme-court-limits-police-power-enter-homes-with-no-warrant-2021-05-17/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=twitter

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

Good moral is important for the troops, take a moment to celebrate a victory when we have them so the troops know there is going to be a celebration after the next battle.

Thanks for the good news poster.

[–] • 2 pts

Let not the perfect become the enemy of the good. And take your wins whenever you can.

[–] • 1 pt

Wow, sometimes they actually follow The Constitution? Who would have thought?

[–] • 1 pt

Hard for me to find praise

Scrotum also effectively voted 7-2 that the election theft need not be looked into.

[–] • 0 pt

Wow. I am impressed it was a 9-0 ruling!

And it ancillarilly concerned a gun in the home case.

[–] • 0 pt

Good. Now do this;

police can not enter private homes unless there is an actual crime going on at that moment.

Wooooo.

Then this, and by then I mean this first;

Fuck off with US vs Miller (1939)

with it goes (((NFA))) (((GCA))) and all unconstitutional restrictions of ANY sort on guns

[–] • -1 pt

Actually in that previous ruling the SCOTUS said the 2A only protects military arms and as no military used short barreled shotguns they weren't protected.

Well, the military uses SBSs, SBRs and suppressors now so they should be protected.

[–] • 0 pt

Actually in that previous ruling the SCOTUS said the 2A only protects military arms

False.

blue account kike account Awful, kike-quality English.

Quote the ruling and where it said what you claim it does. The last true SCOTUS ruling on guns was 2008.

[–] • -1 pt

Are you fucking brain dead? United States v. Miller (1939), the ruling you referenced:

In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length" at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment, or that its use could contribute to the common defense.

Seriously kill yourself.

[–] • 0 pt

finally got one right