In a way, what happens here is very subtle.

Mr. Chipman demonstrates, in one brilliant moment, every aspect of "government" that is corrupted.

He was asked, specifically, to define a term that is codified in law. It's a trick question. The reason it's a trick question, is Mr. Chipman is doing what all corrupt governments do - willingly or otherwise, he is using sophistry to illustrate "a program that defines an assault rifle as any semiautomatic rifle, capable of accepting a detachable magazine, above the caliber of .22.. which would include a .223, which is.."

This is what all these legitimately autistic, no-ability, useless eating, pencil pushing, punchable face faggot bureaucrats do - they coast by life with a path ahead of them illuminated with neon arrows, just wanting to make it to the retirement. They don't care that they are contributing to the majority of the breakdown.

Upton Sinclair put it best, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it".

THIS FUCK WAS AT WACO! He killed women and children! Fuck Chipman.

He doesn't want to define it because the very way these kikes work is through shifting the definitions to their benefit. This is exactly why/how the ATF is trying hard to redefine a firearm, and having it include partially complete receivers, and things like that. These people are domestic enemies.

Assault weapon. It can only be identified as an assault weapon during the period that one would use it for an assault. If one picked the same weapon for defensive purposes, it cannot possibly fit the assault definition. These idiots are trying to weaponize language.

I’m so thankful that I lost allll my assault weapons.

Schooled? No, not at all. Caught up in what he truly believes? Absolutely.

They're coming for your defenses.

These Democrat Fascist Commie faggots need to be tried for treason. There is no way this pig should be confirmed.