> They tried that. Shot down multiple times by SCOTUS and the ruling was actually followed. When have they done anything but double down, sooner or later? They *cant* institute a gun ban, not easily, and not quickly. But they can institute a *graduated tightening* on gun culture through ammo. And if the SC pre-posting the abortion decision to manipulte the elections, or delaying on the vaxx issue, are any indicators, the failure of the SC to rule in their favor is no evidence of them being on our side. What I'm saying is that it is a matter of time. The policy decisions that 'fail' or 'succeed' don't fail or succeed because of poliics. They fail or succeed purely because those 'voting' on them are explicitly told how to vote. There is no "five senators switched last minute! We'll try harder next time to fight the RINOs." Or "both parties compromised on this bill even though no one is happy about it." or "the SC shot down this or that appeal." It is unadultered theater covering over a full blown naked oligarchy thats otherwise operating out in the open. It may seem like hyperbole, I assure you, it's not. > He specifically named blacks and minced no words over it. We've seen this pattern before. 1. endorsed by Trump 2. says something startling honest 3. "based!" 4. gets in 5. does nothing meaningful or lasting with power, pretends at ineffectiveness in the face of opposition, continually fails to call out the worst traitors in our party **which is the VERY least they could do**, even as those very traitors attack the new candidate and side with the opposition. > HOWEVER this slides the overton window quite a bit so despite your partial correctness it's missing the point. Global opposition, which is currently in control of the u.s. government, *wants* the issue on race, and not on nationalism vs. globalism. This is us winning the battle short term, so they can shove us into a primarily race-based civil conflict, and by so doing, ideologically reduce us to a one dimensional issue to any potential future allies or supporters. It's the regime setting us up to fail. Instead we should refocus on FOIA, local election control, anti-communism, anti-zionism, criticism of britain and other 'allies', and turn toward an **America First** as a sentiment. It puts everything under the same umbrella and makes it hard to subvert. It's primarily social while being sufficiently policy-first to have influence politically, and it moves the overton window on issues that are still considered *verboten*, into the realm of the mere political. "muh black gangbangers" is too specific an issue to build anything last on is what I'm saying. We'll **definitely** win this ideological fight on this issue of course, but again, its just a battle, and not the war. And it'll hurt us in the long run because it will have succeeded right where the 1619 project wants it to: adding a racial undertone to 2A and by extension, all the other rights. America succeeded because american culture boiled down to *whites without a double-standard*. WW1 and WW2 killed off a significant number of those genetically prone to that standard (and we'll need another major world war or similar to do the opposite, drafting and killing off the liberal minded, but I digress). If you break this basic premise, whites without a double standard, you break the engine of american strength. Communism, socialism, most other isms, all of that break the double-standard premise. Infinite importation of foreigners breaks the demographic half of the premise. The internecine conflict between blacks and hispanics will normalize into third-world pot-boiling e.x brazilification which will eventually lead both to the cracking of the u.s., and more importantly self-segregation. We fight the blacks now politically, we end up siding with the hispanics, which means the catholic church, and the latinate agenda win, and we all end up mixed into oblivion before descending into brazilification, not simply of half the country, but *globally*. And then a certain asian nation that shall not be named, and a few other nations, collapse us and wipe us out and strip mine the u.s. for resources. This is of course a 50-100 year timeline. The blacks must not be fought now. Instead they must be forced to fight the hispanics, so that they eventually integrate as a block, leaving the rest of us without any recourse but to pull together tightly. In short, the liberal half of europeans and here in america, must be *surrounded* by people that hate them, to either be wiped out by our opponents, or be *forced* to learn a hard lesson about the nature of culture, ethnicity, and race. It works on the small scale, and it will work on the national and global scale. Unite or die.

The definition of a mass murderer is 3 or 4 people killed in a single incidence.