Mirror (if you don't like to open .gov links):
Mirror (if you don't like to open .gov links):
https://vid8.poal.co/uploads/AOU/files/Supreme-Court-Decision-on-Roe-vs-Wade-Released-19-1392_6j37.pdf
This doesn't make abortions illegal. It just means the states get to decide, so libs will have to drive to a blue state to kill their baby.
This doesn't make abortions illegal. It just means the states get to decide, so libs will have to drive to a blue state to kill their baby.
Exactly. But liberal white women will be in a uproar about it regardless
Exactly. But liberal white women will be in a uproar about it regardless
Niggers are at least as mad if not more about this.
Niggers are at least as mad if not more about this.
Law should be that negros can abort and encouraged to do so.
Law should be that negros can abort and encouraged to do so.
Wow so only a few states will be completely replaced by shitskins in a decade as a direct result of this. How reassuring!
Shitskins could barely get abortions before because they’d rather spend the abortion money on crack, do you really think they’re going to spend even more money now to drive to another state to pay for an abortion?
The people we want to have kids are already having kids regardless of whether abortion is illegal or not. All this means is people we don’t want having kids will have more kids.
Wow so only a few states will be completely replaced by shitskins in a decade as a direct result of this. How reassuring!
Shitskins could barely get abortions before because they’d rather spend the abortion money on crack, do you really think they’re going to spend even more money now to drive to another state to pay for an abortion?
The people we want to have kids are already having kids regardless of whether abortion is illegal or not. All this means is people we don’t want having kids will have more kids.
Though I somewhat agree with your opinion, any decision that removes power from the federal government is always a good decision.
Though I somewhat agree with your opinion, any decision that removes power from the federal government is always a good decision.
Exactlyyyy. States should be the deciders in most issues. And I seem to remember my body my choice becoming an issue when it came to the vaccine... hmm weird.
Exactlyyyy. States should be the deciders in most issues. And I seem to remember my body my choice becoming an issue when it came to the vaccine... hmm weird.
Preventing citizens from doing LSD is one thing, Forcing someone to take it is another. Big difference between preventing someone from getting an abortion vs requiring someone to get pregnant. If a nigger rapes a white woman the white woman should be allowed to get an abortion and the nigger should be charged with a capital offense for rape and the circumstance that led to death of a child.
Preventing citizens from doing LSD is one thing, Forcing someone to take it is another. Big difference between preventing someone from getting an abortion vs requiring someone to get pregnant. If a nigger rapes a white woman the white woman should be allowed to get an abortion and the nigger should be charged with a capital offense for rape and the circumstance that led to death of a child.
Yep. Now embrace your vaccine mandates.
Yep. Now embrace your vaccine mandates.
Salt is on the menu boys.
Salt is on the menu boys.
Vaccine mandates are on the menu, boys, girls, babies, women and men!
Vaccine mandates are on the menu, boys, girls, babies, women and men!
Now we know why they decided everyone should be packing heat.
Now we know why they decided everyone should be packing heat.
The decision was gonna happen regardless, the entire premise of the original court case was based off the plaintiff lying about getting raped or something. Literally... states lost a ton of rights over some caddy bitch lying, and now the liberals want to scream its unfair
The decision was gonna happen regardless, the entire premise of the original court case was based off the plaintiff lying about getting raped or something. Literally... states lost a ton of rights over some caddy bitch lying, and now the liberals want to scream its unfair
Regardless of whether she lied, Roe vs Wade was bad law. There wasn't even a shred of support for it in the constitution. And that's the reason it was overturned today.
Regardless of whether she lied, Roe vs Wade was bad law. There wasn't even a shred of support for it in the constitution. And that's the reason it was overturned today.
Rush of liberal politicians rushing into the room to declare they support the right to murder babies unequivocally in 3 2 1…
Rush of liberal politicians rushing into the room to declare they support the right to murder babies unequivocally in
3
2
1…
They didn't do this to stop abortion. They can't have people going around saying "My body, my choice".
This isn't some great thing to save babies, but an attack on personal privacy and bodily autonomy.
They didn't do this to stop abortion. They can't have people going around saying "My body, my choice".
This isn't some great thing to save babies, but an attack on personal privacy and bodily autonomy.
It isn’t about saving babies anyway, it’s about federal government overreach and the Supreme Court acknowledging that it’s been happening. They didn’t outlaw abortion, they said each state has the right to make their own laws about it, which is unequivocally the way it should be
It isn’t about saving babies anyway, it’s about federal government overreach and the Supreme Court acknowledging that it’s been happening. They didn’t outlaw abortion, they said each state has the right to make their own laws about it, which is unequivocally the way it should be
It wasn't federal overreach to protect personal privacy and bodily autonomy.
It wasn't federal overreach to protect personal privacy and bodily autonomy.
Whose bodily autonomy? The mother’s or the child’s?
As long as there’s any reasonable debate to that answer, then yes, it’s overreach for the federal government to have a say in it.
The entire foundation of this country is based on individual states having the right to make those types of answers, so that citizens can have the freedom to move to states who support their side of the debate.
If the federal government has the ability to choose the winning side of every debate, there is no republic, no freedom, no choice; only totalitarianism.
Whose bodily autonomy? The mother’s or the child’s?
As long as there’s any reasonable debate to that answer, then yes, it’s overreach for the federal government to have a say in it.
The entire foundation of this country is based on individual states having the right to make those types of answers, so that citizens can have the freedom to move to states who support their side of the debate.
If the federal government has the ability to choose the winning side of every debate, there is no republic, no freedom, no choice; only totalitarianism.
Coming: a tidal wave of niglets and turdbabies
Coming: a tidal wave of niglets and turdbabies
January 6th!!!!
January 6th!!!!
Yay!!!!!!!
Yay!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeTgx_pj6m8
I'm still confused about all the fuss. Shouldn't they be happy that less federal govt is all in their business? Geez....if you live in a no abortion state and want one - just fucking go to one that allows you to kill your baby (you sick SoB). What's all the fuss about? These liberal nutheads need to get a clue. There will be plenty of murder states still available.
I'm still confused about all the fuss. Shouldn't they be happy that less federal govt is all in their business? Geez....if you live in a no abortion state and want one - just fucking go to one that allows you to kill your baby (you sick SoB). What's all the fuss about? These liberal nutheads need to get a clue. There will be plenty of murder states still available.
I would drink the tears of liberals, but that's how you get hepatitis and the herp.
I would drink the tears of liberals, but that's how you get hepatitis and the herp.
(post is archived)