WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

920

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

The question that should be asked is how anyone who isn't a citizen is able to draw taxpayer funds in the first place. If we cut off support for them they would starve or go back home.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

If we cut off support for them they would starve or go back home.

Between starve and go back home you will get sky rocketing criminality. People won't just let themselves and their relatives starve to death, that's not how it works

So realistically speaking, that money you don't spend on handouts you'll have to spend it on cops and prisons essentially, which will likely be much more expensive and will evidently feed the "prison industrial complex", since america got the great idea to privatize the prison system

UNLESS, every crime/criminal or at least the vast majority of them, gets the death penalty, on the spot or via bounty hunters for instance, known criminals being automatically marked for death, but western societies aren't a spartan fanfic... So this alternative isn't one, it's only a possible alternative in theory, not in practice

It's social peace that they buy with handouts, or at least some semblance of social peace, it's not charity just for the sake of it

[–] 1 pt

I'm fortunate to live in a castle doctrine state. Anyone steps foot on my property uninvited they won't leave.

I do see your point though. I'd rather pay slightly higher taxes to pay to remove these leeches.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Well what's for sure is that free shits is a bad incentive, it's a migroid magnet, so it has to stop and should never has been a thing, at least for foreigners, and not just in america btw

Now as I stated it's not going to cost slightly more given the current context, in terms of security fees / cost of counter measures, but much more... An inmate it's not just a $500 check a month, it's a whole structure, food, housing, medical care, guards... A prison is a welfare city, sort of

[–] 1 pt

He introduces it because it has no chance of becoming law. It is just virtue signaling to conservative voters. Why wasn't this introduced when Republicans had both houses and Trump in the White House? Because the Uniparty thinks we are stupid.

[–] 1 pt

Step in the right direction…

Biggest thing we can do is repeal the thirteenth amendment, though. If the illegals are here, they’re dropping anchor babies.

[–] 1 pt

Why the hell are illegals here first of all secondly they don't deserve one penny. Criminal scum.

[–] 1 pt

Now we’re talking!

[–] 1 pt

I love how Repulsivecants are all border and illegal conscious when they are in the minority with no hope of passing DICK. Theater and bad theater at that.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Yet sadly, the Republicans are still better than the femorat, libtard, tranny, pedophile, communist faggots.

[–] 1 pt

Yet sadly, they Republicans are still better than the femorat, libtard, tranny, pedophile, communist faggots.

By a hair maybe but it seems like that is a difference without a distinction. Let's be honest, these fucks will NOT fight the culture war, secure the border, stop CRT or bring ANYONE to justice. About the only thing that happens when they are in charge is, we have a few more coins in our pocket as they march us a bit slower down the drain.

[–] 0 pt

I agree.

Femorats are like a massive steaming pile of shit that just cannot be cleaned up and reeks of filth.

Republicants are like a massive steaming pile of shit but it can be very slowly cleaned up and doesn't reek as bad but then eventually a femorat is back and the never ending shit pile grows back again. Rinse and repeat.

[–] 1 pt

A “resolution”… not a bill that could eventually become law, but a “resolution”…

Isn’t that like, a strongly worded letter?