I was predicting it would happen to either the jewK or Swedistan. I wasn't far off.
I was predicting it would happen to either the jewK or Swedistan. I wasn't far off.
We all agree that rioting and violence should be punished. We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech.
We all agree? Hardly.
>
We all agree that rioting and violence should be punished. We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech.
We all agree? Hardly.
We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech. Many of those punished in recent days have been convicted for exactly those things.
Other arguments one might make:
- If you're gonna do the time.....
- In for a penny in for a pound.
>We all agree that threats and – genuine, meaningful – incitement to violence are not covered by the right to free speech. **Many of those punished in recent days have been convicted for exactly those things.**
Other arguments one might make:
- If you're gonna do the time.....
- In for a penny in for a pound.
If it was both directions and both sides, someone could make that argument, but it isn't.
If it was both directions and both sides, someone could make that argument, but it isn't.
(post is archived)