Okay. This guy is a doctor but I don't think he's up on the specific science behind this "vaccine". (I have my own issues with it, but I disagree with what a lot of this guy is pointing out.)
The toxicity and immune hyperreaction issues of SARS-type coronavirus protein coats has been known since they tried to make a vaccine for SARS/MERS. A vaccine that contained enough of the protein coat to sensitize the human immune system to the virus would tend to cause a reaction as bad as or worse than the viral infection; worse because, instead of a growing infection the vaccine injection would be a more acute exposure.
This is why the idea of both mRNA and viral vector vaccines were developed. The theory was that, by providing a lower level of exposure to the proteins over a longer period, it would give the body a chance to develop antibodies against the virus while not inducing the immune hyperreaction. It was a brilliant idea. Like many brilliant ideas it had some faults.
Receiving the vaccine is, in general, safer than contracting the disease, by roughly two orders of magnitude. The devil is in the details though. "In general" refers to the entire population. For those who have comorbidities, such as being old or overweight, and your rate of potential exposure is high, then IMO it's not a bad choice to take the vaccine. On the other hand, if you're young and in good physical shape, the odds of the disease harming you are much lower, and the odds of the vaccine causing you injury are higher.
Maybe you can explain something to me since you are "up on the specific science" behind this "vaccine".
How is it possible that injecting gene therapy chemical cocktails is safer than contracting a "disease" that has yet to be isolated and identified? Why doesn't the jab protect against "delta", "mu", "lambda", "kappa", "gamma" variants if they all are blood diseases and s-protein diseases? How do the medical jews determine a new variant if the orginal has never been isolated?
Also, as a side note, how is it possible that I can tell if someone is vaxxed just by the aroma that they are giving off? I'm ~90% efficient in this so far. They all smell like piss.
How is it possible that injecting gene therapy chemical cocktails is safer than contracting a "disease" that has yet to be isolated and identified?
It's not "gene therapy", even the viral types. It's safer according to the statistics gathered over the last several months, at least in the short term. (Assuming the stats haven't been tampered with, and I calculated my numbers using the higher estimates.) (Also, still have to consider longer term effects.)
Why doesn't the jab protect against "delta", "mu", "lambda", "kappa", "gamma" variants if they all are blood diseases and s-protein diseases?
It likely provides less protection against them perhaps no protection; they're saying they have evidence it does, though I have to take that skeptically. The newer variants are likely to be less deadly anyway, since diseases tend to evolve to be more contagious and less deadly, and they seem to be hiding mortality rates for the new variants. But the original variant and close variants are still around and they'll provide some protection against it.
(Now, it's possible for a variant to evolve that's more deadly to those who've been vaccinated. Not sure of the likelihood.)
How do the medical jews determine a new variant if the orginal has never been isolated?
"Medical jews", haha. They've been isolated and sequenced, there just aren't any tests that are capable of discriminating between the minor changes in the protein coats. (The PCR test has been eliminated since it never worked properly and would also have had trouble performing that level of discrimination.)
how is it possible that I can tell if someone is vaxxed just by the aroma that they are giving off? I'm ~90% efficient in this so far. They all smell like piss.
Gonna guess you're smelling amines from the immune system breaking down the antigen proteins. The effect should drop off them over several weeks.
(post is archived)