The significance of 233 | Poal: Say what you want.

[–] • 3 pts

xxx new cases

Remember about a year ago? Where xxx is any three random digits. This would always come up with a news article citing exactly that many new kung flu cases.

link

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Ok so here's how it goes. 2, 3, and 3. 2 of 3 is 6. 3 of 2 is 6. So you have 2x3=6, 3x2=6, and 3x2=6. It's 2x3 because it's 2 times 3 numbers, and 3x2 comes up twice because there's 2 3s. So it becomes 666, which is the mark of the devil. It also works with 322, because 3x2=6, 2x3=6, and 2x3=6. It's 3x2 because there's 2 2s, and each 2 is multiplied by 3 after that and also makes 666.

link

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Yup, they're hiding in plain sight. It's almost like there's a veil over the eyes of the public, that prevents them from 'seeing' the truth that is literally all around them.

link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

(edited )

Meh, this isn't really all that whatever. I'll explain why.

Covid is big news. Local news sites are going to be reporting numbers every day. Reporters are just puking out numbers, numbers, numbers.

When you have thousands of local news agencies reporting on their local numbers you are going to get a certain number of 233s just like how if you randomly toss darts at a dart board, you get a certain number of bullseyes even if you aren't aiming.

Yesterday it was 232. Tomorrow it's 234. But each time the number goes up and down that article gets cached. And so you search for "233 covid" and all those articles from the past year pop up. But, what about the signifigance of "133"? or "245"? What happens when you search for those?

Oh, yeah, you get those too.

This is a red herring by retards who don't understand statistics.

The real number you need to track is the one number NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT... The number of deaths.

ProTip: It's smaller than the margin of error.