That just sounded like what people say when they are pissed off and letting off steam.
The reporters then go on to say it gets much worse, yet we don't get to hear that. I suspect because in context it is much the same.
Not only that, but I guess we're all just fine with secretly recording people nowadays.
The reporter said he left the recording equipment behind on purpose. It was obviously either not visible or it was disguised in some way.
Privacy doesn't matter anymore I guess.
Those were two county commissioners and the sheriff discussing county business. That makes the meeting a quorum. Recording it is legal, and the meeting itself wasn't advertised to the public making the meeting illegal. But he wants to charge the people that busted them being dick's as felons. Fuck those cops and fuck you too you faggot boot licker.
End justifies the means?
It depends if it's a single party consent state under wiretapping laws. Most are two-party consent. I think it's a felony to violate it in most states.
Most are two-party consent
Actually most are 1 party consent. It's a good thing too, because I used to record every interaction between my ex and I. Before doing so I spoke with attorneys and did the research myself. My ex was incredibly toxic and she used to play games with my custody rights with my oldest. Once I proved to the courts she was the one instigating the issues I was given custody.
https://www.justia.com/50-state-surveys/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations/
Usually, conservative states are one party consent, liberal states are usually two party. I’ve had a need to know this before, it’s why I know.
(post is archived)