the demokkkrats are the REAL racists!

>Some Christians on here say we are the jews, hebrews, and isrealites, the true children of Isreal and Judah, that the ones we call jews today are not, rather, that they are the edomites and amalekites. Jews are without a doubt related to native Canaanites, the ones that worshipped Baal & Ashtoreth. It can be easily proven with genetics. In fact, it is something unique to MENA because the Arabs are also descended from Canaanites. MENA are in actual fact a racial mixture, with the main 'ingredient' being European, that's why they were classified as "Caucasoid." Then Ashkenazi & Sephardi are a mixture between MENA & European. They are not "set-apart," except by their prolific incest, otherwise they are just one part of a massive [mixed multitude](https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6154.htm). And of course they are Edomites, Edomites were Judeans at the time when Romans sacked Jerusalem. According to Josephus, Herod was part Edomite, so they had usurped lot of power in Judea. Edomites would have been mostly Canaanite derived ancestry too. [The "Khazars" may have also been descended from Edomites who travelled north instead of remaining to be conquered and assimilated.](https://i.imgur.com/McYz5GN.png) [Article from Israelis about Khazars.](https://web.archive.org/web/20210915065209/https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/) Prototypical Europeans existed before Phoenicians/ Hyksos, so it's more accurate to say that that conquering group in the Levant were European, like Mediterranean or Atlantid, rather than saying that all Europeans are Israel. It's also proven that the Phoenicians had colonies in Europe. Although the term "Phoenician" is an outsider's perspective, and refers to a confederacy of tribes which would have included vassals made up of the native stock, like the Maritime City-state of Tyre. The point is the Phoenicians developed an Alphabet from Egyptian hieroglyphs, and there is archaeological evidence that fits the Exodus narrative in Avaris with the Hyksos. The Jews have no interest in proving that they were in Egypt as slaves, many of them just say it's allegory and fable, they are only concerned with proving that they are native to the Levant. The Bible is a record about ruddy, milk-drinking colonisers, not sneaky chaldean magi or inbred merchants. > Others say that we are the edomites and amalekites, the rabbis claim this in interviews, including the one quoted in this meme. The orthodox Jews/ Hasidic use that label symbolically, kind of like a pejorative, it's saying that we are the spiritual successors to their old time enemies, and it's more about rationalising up motivations to destroy us, but the real reason they want to destroy us is within their nature. Essentially, we are seen as the first and foremost enemy to them, amongst the Goyim (Goyim closely aligning with the concept of "Hylic"). You should pay more attention to genetics though, not their delusions, these Jews rant and we give them too much credit because of the power of other Jews, but have you seen the garbage interpretations in the Talmud? Don't look for logic there, because you'll find non. Kabbalah is known as Jewish Gnosticism, it's derived from Chaldean mysteries amongst others, although tailored towards Jewish nature, that's the kind of shit that really motivates powerful Jews. The Freemasons, whom are an extension of Jewish hegemony, are eclectic Neo-Pagan Gnostics who base much of their practices & teachings off of Kabbalah. [The Noahide stuff does not negate their desire to eclectically unify world religions.](https://i.imgur.com/BvXSRkB.jpg) > Others make a distinction between Isreal and Judah, and say that whites are of Isreal, while Jews are 0f Judah. Lost Tribes were of Israel, not Judea, but there was Judahites who followed Christ, where did they go? Who cares if they are descended from Judah or not, if they are descended from Canaan also? If there are Europeans descended from Judah, that doesn't mean they're inherently good or infallible.