A better way to dispose of it would be to gather all world leaders and lock them in where it is contained. If they want to drink, they drink the water.
If course, it's totally safe!
eh. To be honest, it won't measurably raise the background radiation at all. It will be diluted far past the point of any type of measurability.
That's hardly the issue. Do you know how long the chemicals will remain in the ocean? Every marine animal that goes anywhere near there will be contaminated. For generations!
Your argument is like the government arguing the worldwide contamination of PTFEs
"The PTFEs in your body are extremely diluted. Nothing to worry about goy..."
Every marine animal that goes anywhere near there will be contaminated. For generations!
See, that's where you are incorrect. It will be diluted into the entirety of the ocean. The ocean is vast. In fact, there are serious scientific papers written to the proposition of storing all spent nuclear waste at the bottom of the ocean so that it dilutes into the vastness of the water. Now, I'm not saying that I agree with storing all of our nuclear waste in the ocean, I'm just saying that it sound like you have a fundamental misunderstanding of why this is better than storing it in a concentrated form where it currently poses significant environmental risks.
Dilution does not remove the chemicals. Simple as. It will still seep into living organisms and will still be nuclear waste.
In fact, there are serious scientific papers written to the proposition of storing all spent nuclear waste at the bottom of the ocean so that it dilutes into the vastness of the water.
In fact there are also serious scientific papers that say CO2 is a threat to humanity... And that vaccines are good for you. It is not a solution to dump toxic waste into the ocean. Anyone saying otherwise is a fucking jew. Just leaving the problem for our descendants to deal with.
You are confused by the difference between a mixture and a solution.
(post is archived)