Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

603

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Except it is hardly limited to Evergreen containers.

[–] • 1 pt

Exactly. They just have many out there. When I got my container I asked the ship yard to try to get me a green one. They did, but it doesn't say EVERGREEN on the side.

They go for about $3,000. Great for storage. Helps if you live near a major port, less available and more expensive inland probably.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm inland in canuckistan and had one delivered for $2K in monopoly money. No severe damage or rust holes.

[–] • 0 pt

That sounds like a great deal!

How did they get it off the delivery vehicle? I hired a crane once, and got a side-loader to move it once as well.

[–] • 2 pts

This is one of the most dangerous ways to smuggle someone, as they won’t be able to leave and can suffocate without aid.

The worst part is that this goes on every damn day, and different groups pay to keep it going: pimps, mafia gangs, etc.

Evergreen and many other companies are complicit

[–] • 3 pts

and different groups pay to keep it going: pimps, mafia gangs, etc.

You mean: CIA, Mossad, MI6

The pimps and gangs are their "plausible deniability" muscle.

[–] • 2 pts

The British royal family also owns a shipping company. I remember a ship being arrested at some port with a load of drugs.

[–] • 1 pt

stupid q screencaps ruin this

[–] • 1 pt

I know. I stole it from conspiracies.win They trust the plan.

[–] • 1 pt

Sad that there are probably people slowly dying on that ship.

Oddly enough, when I heard the news, human smuggling was one of the first things I thought of.

[–] • 1 pt

What's the arrow pointing at? I just see dirt.

[–] • 0 pt

It could just be computer glitch.

[–] • 2 pts

A computer glitched, causing the big red arrow somebody intentionally inserted into the image, to point to a random patch of dirt?

[–] • 3 pts

I've seen computer glitches that have shifted millions of votes from one candidate to another :) Now anything is possible.

[–] • 0 pt

(((Q)))

except it's oddly relevant

but there is no timestamp + archive for proof of prediciton

Sigh. inspect element isn't difficult.

[–] • 0 pt

It's so "widely known" that they had to use an artist conception.

[–] • 0 pt

They could have just done a screen grab from any number of old TV episodes.