When someone talks about doing research into 9/11 they either weren't there or didn't pay attention to world politics prior to then. To add insult to injury this persons 'source' is an article written by others who's premise is 'reporters on the ground knew what was happening'. >our goal was to determine the prevalence, among television reporters on 9/11, of the hypothesis that explosions had brought down the Twin Towers. Those that were there, remember the day, and have a memory longer than a puppy understand this would have been the logical conclusion considering the same people had tried to blow up the towers using a truck and explosives in 93. Trucks and explosives were also used in OK. Explosives were the most simple and logical conclusion for anyone watching events unfold. Building 7 aside, there is plenty of footage of structural failure prior to the tops of the buildings falling off. (Yes Building 7 was demoed)