Abiotic oil theory is useful for searching. Earliest proponent i can find is by astronomer Thomas Gold.
I've heard it before, will look into it deeper. Thanks for reminding me.
Abiotic oil theory is useful for searching. Earliest proponent i can find is by astronomer Thomas Gold.
I've heard it before, will look into it deeper. Thanks for reminding me.
Also we've confirmed oil on other planets, many many many times more than possible on Earth, yet no life.
That's more than enough evidence to prove it's true.
Thanks for the link. But did I get this right? Author is a flat earth fag?
That is how oil is made, we have been told sold.
Over, and over, and over again.
Just like we live on a round ball Earth spinning at ridiculous speeds traveling at even more ridiculous speeds around a central Sun tens of millions of miles away, which then travels at even more ridiculous speeds around our Milky Way.
Over the past decade, we have been told that we are running out of oil.
Another Massive Lie.
Much of what the “globe” idea promotes is clearly bullshit without having to entertain a /flat-earth notion. Just saying…
Lol what!?! Someone's credibility just flew out the window.
All the proof that's needed...
Live links from my collection, most are dead since I last delved into the subject.
Abiotic oil with Jerome Corsi https://youtu.be/XfLJp60Pr7Y
One Of The Greatest Lies Ever Told - Abiotic Oil and Fossil Fuels https://youtu.be/nwSnNGS8nmo
Watched the second video, will watch the first one when I catch some time.
Great info, thanks for the share.
Old timer explains
Anyone able to post the txt from 'The Geneva Congress on Organic Nomenclature, 1892' it's paywalled for institutions. I wanna see how it compares to the factchecker bs - ie the naming of 'a new organic compound' aka Oil.
I was taught in school that oil came from Dinosaurs.
Aye wuz tawt eeet frum niggaz jurrykurl axtavatuh!
Same -however 'The Oxford English Dictionary notes that in the phrase "fossil fuel" the adjective "fossil" means "[o]btained by digging; found buried in the earth", which dates to at least 1652,[25] before the English noun "fossil" came to refer primarily to long-dead organisms in the early 18th century.[26]'
It was understood back at the time that it was 'something dug out of the ground' but the meaning morphed into 'le dinosaurs' over time and now includes 'fossilized plant material'
Any sauce on the regeneration of oil theory? I've heard it said but never anything behind it to explain it
Because (((they))) surpress it.
Which I wouldn't doubt, but I'd still like to see the rundown on it
Yeah agreed, I believe it so I'll try and look something up.
I found this and don't know if it's accurate but there is one shill in the comments who rage posts multiple times basically saying what Rothschild said and numerous people said in the days before there was mass media and the sharing of information. From 1700s to 1900s.
https://www.plasticstoday.com/materials/sorry-folks-oil-does-not-come-dinosaurs
"Jaclyn Thompson" seems very angry and I don't know why?
I smell a jew shill here:
Jaclyn Thompson Feb 16, 2023 Nice to seem that you aren't killing our earth and causing cancer. What did the air comment on your bs findings? Nope, you're guilty and this proves you know it sadly. Exactly the opposite of your intended purpose. How do I know? You grasping at a few facts to prove your theory even though there are tons more that prove otherwise. Secondly, your detailed article in fact is a lot of fluff about a couple of theory's and findings. Someone not guilty in fact would pass right by with no thought because they know better of others' claims regarding their product. Guilty individuals write articles screaming 'lies all lies everyone else is saying' with only a few claims backing them up, no scientific evidence. They do this because the guilt has it on their conscience, always there, lurking so they can't quit thinking about it. No matter how you say it, your lying to yourself and us and not convincingly either. I dd some guinea pig fact-finding studies of my own for you unwillingly.I have three dogs. I didn't have specific bowls I use ech day for them to drink or eat and used 4 of 5 in the past. Two were plastic. Over a three-year give or take as I wasn't aware of the scientific study I was doing, period I found the following facts. Every time I used the plastic bowls for the water especially, they would be in the bathroom drinking from the toilet. Soon as I switched it to glass or metal, no more more refreshing toilet water. If I would switch plastic to new plastic water bowl, they would continue their toilet drinks unti it was glass or metal again. That put the idea you are in fact to blame for family and friends cancer now or in the future in a new perspective. I don't know what will. Idiots in fact running lame bs as if we are rubbish, all about you who cares you rose above others' pain and suffering huh? Just like big business. It doesn't take poor people to make the rich , rich,as an idiot justifying their actions said somewhere, sometime. It takes poor people to make some dirty rich like the one justifying their actions now. Hmmmmmmm. What you wrote in fact screams your guilt and the fact you do give not a flying F about any of us or the world we reside in. Thanks for your contribution to the loss of life in all forms as we knew it.
And the idea of the personal carbon footprint was actually thought of by BPs PR team. They wanted to shift focus of climate change from businesses to the individual.
(post is archived)