WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

The only explanation that makes sense. Now that they can get all the money they want through money printing they no longer need to keep up the facade.

[–] 0 pt

What you do is you pay just enough money to the people "assisting" your operation to justify the savings you get by not being taxed.

Say you would need to pay 100k in taxes if you used legal channels to "wash" what you're moving around. If, instead, you can just pay off someone with 80k and keep the remaining additional 20k on top, you would pragmatically decide upon the second route to conserve more of the "energy" to move the funds around.

What Mendax shows permeates a plethora of finance systems. The most popular methods outside of large scale government laundering operations, more local versions, are non-profits, especially poverty funds and the likes and "streamers" who are exploited by sometimes wealthy uncles who need to wash money.

Laundromats have become antiquated and these operations are not very obscured. The vast majority are out in the open, you just aren't allowed to audit them and if you try, your lives would be destroyed.

Philanthropy, whether or not anyone wants to acknowledge it, is done by individuals or church communities in large part. You guys keep getting worked and you need to listen to people who are trying to help you and you also need to stop playing in to the ruse the overseers keep thrusting upon you. Starving The Beast is imperative.