![Living in Hitler's Germany [2300x940 - 269KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/ps49pR.png){kind=link}
Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for sharing.
But how many blacks were there
But how many blacks were there
Very very few, though not none. The few that did worked as actors and entertainers for the most part and im not sure where they lived, the rest served in the German military as foreign volunteers in the African campaign, located outside the reich. Other 'honorary' races, including a troubling amount of jews, served in the Waffen-SS for various reasons. I'll try to find an article about it.
Otherwise it was a white Germanic Ethnostate.
Very very few, though not none. The few that did worked as actors and entertainers for the most part and im not sure where they lived, the rest served in the German military as foreign volunteers in the African campaign, located outside the reich. Other 'honorary' races, including a troubling amount of jews, served in the Waffen-SS for various reasons. I'll try to find an article about it.
Otherwise it was a white Germanic Ethnostate.
So, did real socialism get tried here and more or less worked?
So, did real socialism get tried here and more or less worked?
'Socialism' in a Marxist/Leninist/Utopianism sense does not work AT ALL. EVER.
Hitler was kinda an autist and refused to use any other term besides 'Socialism' in National Socialism, as he believed the word went back to the earliest Germanic peoples. It's more accurately described as 'Volkism' and refers to making the economy and national markets tailored to the people, with money backed by labor serving the nation and it's people, rather than exploitable things like gold or magic jew numbers.
It's one of the hardest things to understand (apparently), that the socialism in NatSoc is not at all and nowhere related to Socialism in the failure-prone, jewish Marxist sense. Here's something to read that explains it excellently and refers to it as 'Socialism of Duty'.
'Socialism' in a Marxist/Leninist/Utopianism sense does not work AT ALL. EVER.
Hitler was kinda an autist and refused to use any other term besides 'Socialism' in National Socialism, as he believed the word went back to the earliest Germanic peoples. It's more accurately described as 'Volkism' and refers to making the economy and national markets tailored to the people, with money backed by labor serving the nation and it's people, rather than exploitable things like gold or magic jew numbers.
It's one of the hardest things to understand (apparently), that the socialism in NatSoc is not at all and nowhere related to Socialism in the failure-prone, jewish Marxist sense. Here's something to read that explains it excellently and refers to it as 'Socialism of Duty'.
[Fascist Economics](https://ia903202.us.archive.org/29/items/fascist-economics-and-socialism-of-duty-iron-march/Fascist%20Economics%20and%20Socialism%20of%20Duty%20-%20Iron%20March.pdf)
Very well stated. Thank you for that link as well (also a catbox link for that pdf: https://files.catbox.moe/l6nax2.pdf).
Many are not capable of getting over the usage of the word 'Socialism' in National Socialism as they can only associate that word with the much more recent kiked usage. Kikes intentionally subverted the Aryan-created concept and took its name so they could invert everything it stood for to instead be the opposite of what it originally was, just as they have done throughout history and still do today with many terms and concepts. I attribute Hitler's insistence on its usage in National Socialism as having been borne from refusal to give any ground to the kikes' attempts at subversion and erasure of Aryan's and our history.
"Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists."
"Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as Socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality. And, unlike Marxism, it is patriotic."
"We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our Socialism is national. We demand the fulfillment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us, State and Race are one." https://archive.ph/x06z6#selection-2317.0-2329.306
theguardian.com/theguardian/2007/sep/17/greatinterviews1 https://archive.ph/x06z6 This edited interview of Adolf Hitler by George Sylvester Viereck took place in 1923. It was republished in Liberty magazine in July 1932.
Or image form of this excerpt: https://files.catbox.moe/ytng9z.jpg
Very well stated. Thank you for that link as well (also a catbox link for that pdf: https://files.catbox.moe/l6nax2.pdf).
Many are not capable of getting over the usage of the word 'Socialism' in National Socialism as they can only associate that word with the much more recent kiked usage. Kikes intentionally subverted the Aryan-created concept and took its name so they could invert everything it stood for to instead be the opposite of what it originally was, just as they have done throughout history and still do today with many terms and concepts. I attribute Hitler's insistence on its usage in National Socialism as having been borne from refusal to give any ground to the kikes' attempts at subversion and erasure of Aryan's and our history.
>"*Socialism is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.*"
>
>"*Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as Socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality. And, unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.*"
>
>"*We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our Socialism is national. We demand the fulfillment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us, State and Race are one.*"
https://archive.ph/x06z6#selection-2317.0-2329.306
theguardian.com/theguardian/2007/sep/17/greatinterviews1
https://archive.ph/x06z6
This edited interview of Adolf Hitler by George Sylvester Viereck took place in 1923. It was republished in Liberty magazine in July 1932.
Or image form of this excerpt: https://files.catbox.moe/ytng9z.jpg
Also: https://files.catbox.moe/wu78bt.jpg
A banker paying marx to write his shit starts to make sense
A banker paying marx to write his shit starts to make sense
I was born too late :(
I was born too late :(
(post is archived)