Comment from the article's site sums it up best.
So the problem is no longer that the play dehumanizes women by defining them as nothing but their birth canal?
And no longer that the play promotes the homosexual rape of an young teen girl?
It's that the playwright actually knew what female anatomy is when she decided to dehumanize women by defining them as nothing but their birth canals?
Every time you think the left-libs have reached the ultimate low they get a shovel and start digging.
Comment from the article's site sums it up best.
>So the problem is no longer that the play dehumanizes women by defining them as nothing but their birth canal?
>And no longer that the play promotes the homosexual rape of an young teen girl?
>It's that the playwright actually knew what female anatomy is when she decided to dehumanize women by defining them as nothing but their birth canals?
>Every time you think the left-libs have reached the ultimate low they get a shovel and start digging.
(post is archived)