Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

828

Without surprise, it's almost cleanly divided among party lines, with R (save 1) saying no, and D saying yes. No stance is recorded for dewino.

Without surprise, it's almost cleanly divided among party lines, with R (save 1) saying no, and D saying yes. No stance is recorded for dewino.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Every time marijuana gets legalized, states go "blue" in short order.

[–] • 1 pt

It's primarily the Democratic side of the house that's in favor of legal drugs.

[–] • 0 pt

I think there is going to be a tipping point where people stop migrating for the sake of living in states that have legalized marijuana and the flipping phenomenon disappears.

[–] • 1 pt

We shall see. I also think pot legalization increases other jewish ways of thinking among the population.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It certainly is a strange dynamic as a social currency. Groups that don't like weed are typically right leaning so to get marijuana where it isn't legal, you have to be in with left leaning crowds or at least tolerant of them. So then as a state legalizes marijuana it attracts a left leaning crowd. If there were a right leaning 'federal narcotics scheduling is unconstitutional and the free market will provide a quality product' access to marijuana dynamic then you might see a red shift after legalization.

[–] • 2 pts

How about their position on eliminating property taxes for homestea... they're unified on that one? Mmmkay, I'll just... I'll just sit back down, s-sorry.

[–] • 2 pts

(((marijuana)))

[–] • 1 pt

It shouldn't even be a question, the answer should be "No."

[–] • 1 pt

Are birds real?

[–] • 1 pt

I never could figure out why the kikes never direct their goy herd politicians to make all drugs legal. China was doped up for nearly 100 years.

[–] • 1 pt

Marijuana is directly related to Hearst's legacy about demonizing cannabis. "Yellow Journalism" was coined due to his smear efforts in regards to cannabis.

The conspiracy part of that even is he was afraid that paper from hemp would dethrone paper from wood. Hearst was a newspaper magnate and owed a lot of money to woodpulp paper producers, so that theory doesn't really hold up as he would have benefitted from cheaper to make paper. More likely, he was just one of those bible-thumpers that would decry anything mind altering while downing his 10-martini lunch.

[–] • 0 pt

Drugs make a large market for dark money, enable prostitution, human trafficking, gangs but chiefly when they are illegal.