Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

CAUTION Because of the replenerative flow characteristics of positive ions in unilateral phase detractors, the use of the quasistatic regeneration oscillator is recommended if Turboencabulator is used in explosive atmospheres!

**CAUTION** Because of the replenerative flow characteristics of positive ions in unilateral phase detractors, the use of the quasistatic regeneration oscillator is recommended if Turboencabulator is used in explosive atmospheres!

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Yeah, but how much Write-Only-Memory does the thing have? None, that's how much. And you're never going to get anything done like that.

[–] • 1 pt

Actually if only cosine-wave directors are available, their output must be first fed into a phase inverter with parametric negative-time compensators. However you are right, goniometric data is only available for an additional charge.

You're applying 2023 standards on 1962 technology, yes it does have limitations!

[–] • 1 pt

You're applying 2023 standards on 1962 technology, yes it does have limitations!

I want it all, and I want it in 1935.

[–] • 1 pt

Actually from the Accessories section, it does include both analog to digital converter with reflected levorotatory BCD output and a quasistatic regeneration oscillator with an output conductance of 17.8 milliohms. So you could just attach that to your oscilliscope and read it directly - provided you have the non-reversible differential tremie pipes setup correctly, of course.

[–] • 1 pt

Come in! They all have an Amulite baseplate and it has to be prefabulated to even work. That is like saying "Oh look! My car has wheels!"

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah I thought the same, too. "Our trees have Bark!" No, duh. But I was impressed with the way they aligned the two main spurving bearings with the penametric fan. That's a real differentiator compared to other encabulators.

[–] • 1 pt

This was back when encabulators were made in America and made like a tank. I've got an old Rockwell from the late 1950s, nowhere near as sophisticated as this but you could drop a bomb on it and it wouldn't even scratch it.

[–] • 0 pt

Damn you have one of those?! You can sell it on eBay and retire :)