Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

840

Kind of reminds me of Linksys pushing out a "new" version of the venerable WRT54GL. They completely missed the mark on why the old one was popular.

Kind of reminds me of Linksys pushing out a "new" version of the venerable WRT54GL. They completely missed the mark on why the old one was popular.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts

Moving back to a 'dumbphone' looking better and better as time marches on.

[–] • 3 pts

There are perfectly reasonably priced smartphones out there. This isn't one of them.

[–] • 1 pt

Especially because .

[–] • 3 pts

Interesting choice of names.

Wasn't there a previous Razer that was marketed as being a first of it's kind innovation (ultra slim) but ended up being an expensive piece of crap that was quickly followed by better alternatives?

[–] • 5 pts

No. The RAZR was a fairly expensive (for the time) but very innovative and groundbreaking device.

This one is a piece of shite capitalizing on an old name.

[–] • 2 pts

This doesn't seem too different from what I said.

[–] • 3 pts

The original RAZR was a pretty good piece of kit, I had one and it wasn't crap.

So...I guess kind of yes?

Unless you mean the first version of this current piece of crap.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

when tech becomes a gucci......over priced, does the same as a cheaper version, but,....we live in a throw away society. How long b4 this one becomes old news?

[–] • 2 pts

I think it really already is.