What the fuck are you on about? Gab is full of people calling out jews. My feed is full of them. I am not sure I cannot find a single thread where someone doesn't blame jews even for shit they had nothing to do with.
I
I never said Gab bans ALL jew namers!
I never said Gab bans as many Jew Namers as they used to ban per month.
Gab also DELETES posts and bans people so you would never see all their censoring tactics at Gab.
Gab bans Jew namers. Gab never invited them back, or apologized.
Gab.ai banned a political candidate that at one time had 18% of poll number at peak.
https://gab.com/gab/posts/41584631 [admin post DELETED BY JEW PUPPET GAB and then memory holed]
Patrick Little was banned on Gab for a false allegation by Gab admins, invented 25 days after the banning. He was a Jew Namer. He was banned. When pressured gab.ai claimed he committed some form of crime. The crime was provable free speech and not a direct threat of any crime.
Gab refuses to apologize or let Patrick back onto Gab.
Politician Patrick Little is a victim of Gab deletion and censorship and banning, for 100% legal USA speech that agitated Jews, but he also is an infamous JEW NAMER.
Gab interfered with USA elections and deleted and censored and banned political speech by Patrick Little.
Patrick or someone on his thread stated that he hoped someone would deface a jewish holocaust memorial in the next 365 days or less. Neither of the two SCOTUS tests for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action are met ! Provable free speech.
The US Supreme court ruled MANY MANY TIMES that to be illegal speech and a call to imminent violence or crime, an utterance needs TWO components :
1 - A SPECIFIC TARGET OR TARGETS not including a complete class of targets.
2 - AN IMMINENT TIME PERIOD LESS THAN 365 days from now.
NEITHER condition was met by gab.ai preposterous post-ban claim, and the utterance is wholly free speech.
BOTH criteria for illegal speech (plea for imminent lawless action) that any first year law student is taught:
Famous SCOTUS Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action
SCOTUS Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973) [must be less than 12 months] :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hess_v._Indiana
There are like 68 or more holohoax memorials in usa all over and not naming a subset or viable target also makes the speech into FREE SPEECH. Patrick did not name a specific target, or subset, making it free speech according to US law.
He also did not name a specific time.
Patrick Little was a Senate candidate!
And (((Gab.ai))) got caught deleting two posts by Patrick Little !!!
The posts were NOT ILLEGAL under US LAW!!!
HE WAS BANNED WITH FAKE CRAP ON GAB.AI POSTED 25 DAYS IN THE PAST!!!!
Gab.ai banned Patrick Little, despite Patrick knowing cleverly what is legal or not to type in the USA, and Patrick using a non imminent time of 365 days or less, rather than 364 days or less to make it a legal protected speech claim under well worn well established SCOTUS rulings. Patrick is also a shit lord by picking a class of targets wider than the focus needed to make it an illegal statement by including all objects in the class of targets : namely all 68 us holohoax memorials, rather than a named selection. Patrick knows how to skate the line !
GAB.AI CENSORS JEW NAMERS!
After first blaming Domain Name registrar, Gab later admitted (((big tech))) (Microsoft), ordered him to delete the Jew Namers from Gab, OR ELSE MICROSOFT CLOUD WOULD DROP GAB!!! (Just like Parler problem in later years)
see ? :
Gab later admitted that de facto JEWS RUN GAB, and JEWS and Gab together shoahed Patrick Little,
Patrick Little had 18% polling in polls less than 4 years ago. His past interviews mentioning how xx % of government is fully run by jews, cost him though. Even Republican Party tried to stop him and Democrats did not want to try and partially advance him in jest, as they did with Trump (backfired).
The left (socialist) is the Nazi party, (refer to https://www.dineshdsouza.com/books/the-big-lie/) but they tried to brand this guy as a National Socialist when his polling hit 18% : https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/05/03/neo-nazi-california-senate/579612002/
look at the link format!!! It actually claims a RIGHT wing guy is a socialist ! Naughty MSM.
That's USA today that stated :
Patrick Little got more support than any other Republican candidate in an April 27 SurveyUSA poll. Little polled at 18%, compared with Feinstein's 39%. The next highest-performing GOP candidate came in at 8%.
18% to 1% ... Amazing what the deep state can achieve against a guy.
GAB.AI weeks after banning LIED! (25 DAYS later)
Hurray For Patrick Little! The protector of FREE SPEECH!
Fuck lying Jew no-free-speech Gab.ai.
Ask talk.lol's 'chrimony', or ask 'DirectPressure' or 'NewWorldEbola', about their experiences seeing Gab delete Jew namers.
By the way : Patrick Little's non-deleted jew-naming content still allowed on BitChute (BitShit deleted 20 videos) : https://www.bitchute.com/profile/pog2EPByxzRc/
Don't trust Gab's Torba, not even a little: https://files.catbox.moe/mastlq.png https://files.catbox.moe/36dg8u.png https://files.catbox.moe/xmfvua.jpeg https://files.catbox.moe/w829sf.jpeg
Gab and Jew Epik CEO Rob Monster censor together sometimes, for Democrats. The Christopher Cantwell incident : https://files.catbox.moe/9knanz.jpeg
Also gab.com was originally "gab.ai", and gabbai (Hebrew: גבאי) is someone that assists jews: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabbai
"gab.ai" is the original name of gab.com, and "gab.ai" was no accident they chose that domain name.
https://gab.ai/ See? that still works! Try that link!
Gabbai is coincidentally also a jewish last name. The Gabbai (Gubbay, Gabbay) family of Baghdadi jews was literally in bed with the SASSOON family and they moved to India in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
EVERY WORD I typed above is 100% factual and backed up by various links and news articles. Gab indeed has at times deleted Jew Namers.
I appreciate the information and I believe you.
But I would have banned him as well if Patrick posted that on my site. That has nothing to do with free speech, supreme court tests or anything like that. It has to do with strategic understanding of how to play the game.
The problem you describe has NOTHING to do with free speech and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that Israel has assassination squads executing people they don't like on a list.
If you have ever worked with jews long enough, you will know that they and all cultures from the middle east have what I term as a 'razors edge' kind of psychology. When anyone from those cultures decides they want you dead, they will wait and wait and wait and wait even if it takes generations to kill you. All the while they will smile, tell you what you want to hear and be your best friend and even do unbelievable favours for you ... just so that they can position them selves for the kill at the right time and place.
You guys seriously don't understand the games you are playing nor the strategic positions that you have to take to move your chess pieces into position.
This is the problem with white people. Unbelievably short term thinkers, completely incapable of being pragmatic and flexibly and completely unable to parse their value systems in ways that allow them military and strategic advantage. White people, virtually to a fault, pick a set of VIRTUES to follow and abide so rigidly to those virtues that they ALWAYS end up trading away 100% of the strategic and military options away.
The more that I listen to some of you talk, the more I start to understand why jews think of white people as basically cattle. Whites are smart and we make everything but we are too fucking stupid to just walk through the fences that jews slowly build around us to coralle us. I mean, just read your own post. I mean, frankly, if white people keep on acting this fucking retarded, you fucking deserve to be slaughtered like the cattle that you act like.
Take for example your post. You are, apparently correctly, pointing out that Patricks post is legal and it is free speech. Yet, you are so completely unable to comprehend the value of fostering online spaces in terms strategic positioning that you are willing to hurt your own peoples position just to make a vanity point about being absolutely pure and virtuous about an issue that has little to no strategic value.
The bottom line is this: any platform that allows even the inference of negative positions will not only be shut down by the globohomo zionist cultists infesting our lands you will eventually get put on israels kill list and you won't live long enough to help anyone with anything.
And that is the least of it. Frankly, at the end of the day if someone wants to get offed it doesn't even matter because they are too stupid to play this game. The amount of chess moves available is vast and we have a lot of options. One of the key strategic points that banning people that post things like Patrick provide us is access to the psychology and morale chess moves. The job of leadership at any level is to lead your people to a better and more prosperous future by providing the psychological, social and cultural frameworks that allow our people to build happy and productive lives. Anyone that is not doing that is not a leader but a detriment to their own people because leading your people down a road to their own death is exactly the kind of cancer that needs to be carefully excised from the group.
I mean, I watched Patricks run and loved the whole thing. But, if you have any kind of social radar you will know that you, me and everyone that watches one of his videos knows there is an edge there sitting just under his thin skin that none of us like. It's a lot like the edge that we discovered about Richard Spencer. Spencer was just optical enough to be able to hide his edge quite a bit deeper, it took an audio recording released by Milo to show his true nature - an egomaniacal tyrant bent on utter self destruction willing to take his own people down with him.
So, yeah. Ostensibly, you are right. But, you are deliberately obfuscating that Patrick was banned for calls to negativity, not banned for calling out jews. And, honestly, not letting him back on is not just protection for the platform, it is an important lesson for Patrick to get more sophisticated if he is able to. Although, if my radar is correct, I would need to see a substantial demonstration from Patrick that he is able to learn and upgrade his skills before I would believe there isn't significant danger there.
You are being pragmatic, but I am a Free Speech absolutist.... a hyper-patriot. I probably should fear the Jews more, but I've reached the end of my tether. No longer will I curtail my speech to appease the subverting socialist kikes.
Patrick Little was a Hero
(post is archived)