This has been boogey manned for years. It's supplemental intel at best.
This has been boogey manned for years. It's supplemental intel at best.
Your WiFi devices generate sufficient signal to now convert to images of people in home/building interiors. The global panopticon has arrived.
Your WiFi devices generate sufficient signal to now convert to images of people in home/building interiors. The global panopticon has arrived.
Why do you think they made all the TV's 'smart' with built in wireless?
Why do you think they made all the TV's 'smart' with built in wireless?
Why do you think they made all the TV's 'smart' with built in wireless?
So they can spy on you very clearly using the built in cameras and microphones. Who needs to use WiFi to get a less than potato quality image of blobs when you can use an HD camera instead? That's why TVs went smart.
>Why do you think they made all the TV's 'smart' with built in wireless?
So they can spy on you very clearly using the built in cameras and microphones. Who needs to use WiFi to get a less than potato quality image of blobs when you can use an HD camera instead? That's why TVs went smart.
The resolution is terrible. Basically, what you can determine are blobs.
The resolution is terrible. Basically, what you can determine are blobs.
Well they can admire the cat tree and my lamp in the corner.
Isn't this mostly for hostage situations and stuff like that?
Well they can admire the cat tree and my lamp in the corner.
Isn't this mostly for hostage situations and stuff like that?
Not letting them see into your home means you have something to hide. If you're not doing anything wrong and you have nothing to hide, there's no problem with letting them see into your home.
It isn't about them only seeing that you have a cat tree and a lamp in the corner. Even if one has nothing to hide, nobody else has any business looking at what you have in your home in the first place.
(EDIT: I wasn't quoting you, just noting the commonly stated fallacy that resistance to eyes prying into your personal space implies that you are hiding something that you don't want to be seen.)
>Not letting them see into your home means you have something to hide.
>If you're not doing anything wrong and you have nothing to hide, there's no problem with letting them see into your home.
It isn't about them only seeing that you have a cat tree and a lamp in the corner. Even if one has nothing to hide, nobody else has any business looking at what you have in your home in the first place.
(EDIT: I wasn't quoting you, just noting the commonly stated fallacy that resistance to eyes prying into your personal space implies that you are hiding something that you don't want to be seen.)
Everybody has some quirk that they are embarrassed about. When people claim they have no problem with the government looking, I ask the men if they get pegged by the missus and I ask the women how big the mailman's schlong is. Those questions get my points across.
Everybody has some quirk that they are embarrassed about. When people claim they have no problem with the government looking, I ask the men if they get pegged by the missus and I ask the women how big the mailman's schlong is. Those questions get my points across.
Lol. Some quirk or some anything they're trying to hide. The "free" cable. The extra food stamps, the ass fucking... heck just about anything anymore.
Lol. Some quirk or some anything they're trying to hide. The "free" cable. The extra food stamps, the ass fucking... heck just about anything anymore.
Agreed. I wasn't making light (lite?) of this reality and invasion of property and privacy; honestly, stuff like this literally overwhelms my brain thinking about how they can and will attack you without cause.
Agreed. I wasn't making light (lite?) of this reality and invasion of property and privacy; honestly, stuff like this literally overwhelms my brain thinking about how they can and will attack you without cause.
I have nothing to hide. However, that does not mean I have anything to offer. They can all fuck off.
I have nothing to hide. However, that does not mean I have anything to offer. They can all fuck off.
Well that's obviously not the point. They move the goalposts whenever it suits them. Today's hostage situation is tomorrow's spicy meme that upset the wrong person.
Well that's obviously not the point. They move the goalposts whenever it suits them. Today's hostage situation is tomorrow's spicy meme that upset the wrong person.
It's far worse than that! Using even higher frequency radiation allows the government to see high quality images of you, your family and the contents of your home through your windows! A sophisticated new technology called a "flashlight" outputs an intense beam of high frequency electromagnetic radiation that can allow people to see inside your home even in complete darkness. This technology has been perfected after over 100 years of research and it has used by every government agency employee and contractor! No one is safe from this technology!
BTW, Bluetooth can do the same thing. And they wouldn't even need your WiFi router if they bring their own an place it outside you home. Or they can just have a much higher power and higher frequency setup in a van like they have been doing for much longer and get better quality surveillance. But yeah, WiFi scary!
It's far worse than that! Using even higher frequency radiation allows the government to see high quality images of you, your family and the contents of your home through your windows! A sophisticated new technology called a "flashlight" outputs an intense beam of high frequency electromagnetic radiation that can allow people to see inside your home even in complete darkness. This technology has been perfected after over 100 years of research and it has used by every government agency employee and contractor! No one is safe from this technology!
BTW, Bluetooth can do the same thing. And they wouldn't even need your WiFi router if they bring their own an place it outside you home. Or they can just have a much higher power and higher frequency setup in a van like they have been doing for much longer and get better quality surveillance. But yeah, WiFi scary!
Batman predicted many things. This isn't exactly breaking news, but it's still wtf
Batman predicted many things. This isn't exactly breaking news, but it's still wtf
Makes me think about why they removed lead paint from homes? The direct fear was that children would eat fallen paint chips. Lead vests in an X-ray room are acceptable. Hmm.
Makes me think about why they removed lead paint from homes? The direct fear was that children would eat fallen paint chips. Lead vests in an X-ray room are acceptable. Hmm.
Makes me think about why they removed lead paint from homes? The direct fear was that children would eat fallen paint chips. Lead vests in an X-ray room are acceptable. Hmm.
So many things wrong with this I don't know where to start.
First off, WiFi is non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation which is not at all the same as X-rays. Second, even if X-rays were used, the lead in the paint was not of sufficient quantities to block the radiation. Third, lead that is in a chemical compound, say lead sulfate, is not going to do much blocking of radiation because the lead molecules are "busy" being in a compound with sulfur and oxygen and the lead won't react much to extra energy being available since they are at rest within their molecular bonds. If lead paint worked for blocking radiation, we could have just painted everything with lead paint and not have to use those heavy metallic lead vests. Nuclear reactors would just need some paint to keep everyone safe. But that's not how any of this works. And none of this applies to WiFi anyway.
>Makes me think about why they removed lead paint from homes? The direct fear was that children would eat fallen paint chips. Lead vests in an X-ray room are acceptable. Hmm.
So many things wrong with this I don't know where to start.
First off, WiFi is non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation which is not at all the same as X-rays. Second, even if X-rays were used, the lead in the paint was not of sufficient quantities to block the radiation. Third, lead that is in a chemical compound, say lead sulfate, is not going to do much blocking of radiation because the lead molecules are "busy" being in a compound with sulfur and oxygen and the lead won't react much to extra energy being available since they are at rest within their molecular bonds. If lead paint worked for blocking radiation, we could have just painted everything with lead paint and not have to use those heavy metallic lead vests. Nuclear reactors would just need some paint to keep everyone safe. But that's not how any of this works. And none of this applies to WiFi anyway.
You are by far more intelligent than myself. I was just sharing thoughts via experience. My words above were mostly mockery.
You are by far more intelligent than myself. I was just sharing thoughts via experience. My words above were mostly mockery.
Nothing to mock a kid with high blood lead levels. It makes them dopey and slow. Lead vests are heavy as shit.
Nothing to mock a kid with high blood lead levels. It makes them dopey and slow. Lead vests are heavy as shit.
> Now
Ha, yeah, only just now. Certainly not been a thing for years.
>> Now
Ha, yeah, only just now. Certainly not been a thing for years.
They watch you fap
They watch you fap
Always has been able too...
Always has been able too...
Nope, what you see it the output of an AI trained on very blurry source data. It would be like installing a magnetic door sensor and claiming it can see what your open and closed door looks like. No, all it sees is a binary. If you put their research router in another building it wouldn't be able to see people because it wouldn't be trained for the environment. It's not like a camera.
Nope, what you see it the output of an AI trained on very blurry source data. It would be like installing a magnetic door sensor and claiming it can see what your open and closed door looks like. No, all it sees is a binary. If you put their research router in another building it wouldn't be able to see people because it wouldn't be trained for the environment. It's not like a camera.
(post is archived)