WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

949

Don't care, I still don't want an EV!

Don't care, I still don't want an EV!

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

Let's imagine a new battery that improves energy density 3 times with a 15-minute charge time. I bet you already understand the inherent problem here.

Now let's imagine a battery with 100 times the energy density of current designs with a charging time of one minute. Utopia!

Well, not so fast. Yea, many of you already know the problem of getting energy to your awesome battery. Using Ohm's law we know that a 100KWh battery would require a charge voltage of about 100 thousand volts at 100 amps for 5 minutes.

Now imagine half the US population trying to charge that awesome battery.

[–] 3 pts

I'm gonna be rich. I just invested in a hamster ranch. We're raising the little creatures and manufacturing hamster wheel generators. There will be one in every EV. I need a distributor partner and a source of hamster food. Send shekels, please.

[–] 1 pt

How do you deal with the poop?

How many pellets per mile?

Please send me your crowd funding link. I don't want to miss out!

[–] 1 pt

The poop falls on the streets. It deters BLM riots. Kinda slippery when it rains, though. I'm still calculating mileage, I'll get back to you.

[–] 2 pts

They're already trying to bring down the grid, this would sure speed that up.

[–] 1 pt

Don't forget the required cooling system draw.

[–] 9 pts

Charging times are not limited by battery tech (in a real world situation), but by the amount of power that can be drawn from the grid at the charging point. That means that if you have 4 charging stations, but only one car plugged in, you might get your current EV charged in 40min. But if 4 people turn up, it'll take 2 and a half hours for all of them. Having a battery that can be charged 3 times faster won't mean shit unless you have a several MW connection to the grid at every charging station. That requires an order of magnitude increase in the grid capacity, which means effectively replacing the entire electricity grid.

[–] 3 pts

We all know that's not going to happen. They won't even maintain the one we have!

[–] 5 pts

Do they have a 300% larger explosion radius as well? And explode 300% sooner than a Tesla?

[–] 1 pt

Hurricane season has ended in the Northern hemisphere. We'll have to wait until next year or for news from Argentina & Australia.

[–] 1 pt

Burn 300% hotter, and 300% harder to extinguish

[–] 0 pt

I'm technologically-challenged, but if logic dictates..... 💥

[–] 5 pts

yahoo link

Don't be a lazy nigger and share an archived link too.

https://archive.ph/1xIV5

[–] 3 pts

I'm sorry. Not lazy, just forgot. I'm old, please forgive me this time. Thanks for providing the link for me, though.

[–] 4 pts

lol I was kidding. That's the sentence I use when someone shares a jewed link without an archived one.

[–] 3 pts

I had a feeling you were, but since I wasn't sure, I decided not to call you a faggot. 😄

[–] 2 pts

You're an old lazy nigger... Me too.

[–] 2 pts

Seems like there's a few of us here! 😆

[–] 2 pts
[–] 0 pt

I presume you're talking about what they claim in the article.

I don't know enough about the technology to say either way.

It's all rocket science, in Greek, to me! ;)

[–] 1 pt

The non-rocket-science part is making a battery 4x the energy density of current tech. Breakthroughs of that scale just don't occur.

[–] 0 pt

Thank you, that I can understand.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I wonder how the battery fares with memory and declining capacity

[–] 1 pt

Your guess is probably better than mine as I know very little about it.

[–] 1 pt

Is a solid state battery just a capacitor? What happens if you short-circuit that battery? Is the fire also three times hotter?

[–] 0 pt

Good question. I haven't a clue.