WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

[–] [Sticky] 4 pts
[–] 2 pts (edited )

Also this one: !

How do you structure/classify your data so you can find stuff so fast? A special program? Tags? Attaching meta data to to the resources? Long file names? A zillion folders? AI?

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Here are some more of those relating to kike genetics:

As for your question, a combination of things.

Firstly I go by memory. I have checked poal thoroughly almost every day for years now and I remember most things that have been posted, and saved most things I found save-worthy. It is surprising how many times the same things get reposted over the years as if they were new or posted as if they had recently/just happened but are from years ago.

When I save images from poal, I title it with keywords to identify the key parts of the image; e.g. "kike genes 1 - Study says all ashkenazi jews are 30th cousins -p8- ojU4AD.jpg", or "kike control - governments - israel PM admits jews used controlled puppets in US gov to push laws making it illegal to boycott israel -p8- N10X9Q.jpg".

The p8 was the pic8 link from when that existed so I could quickly link that image. As pic8 is gone, I use it mostly as a relic for finding an image to reupload when needed.

The file names do get pretty long, though. While I have over 85 gigs in my general "kikes" folder alone, I have others that are also kike-related, such as "nigs". Many folders are archived for reference that I can pull from backup drives, but files I keep readily available on-disk in the many folders total over 124gigs.

After I look at which images I have fit with the post, I then look up the dimensions of each image on poal to find the posts I saved them from while I am uploading them to the comment.

I also have text files of (some) things I've posted over the years so that I can quickly reference, copy, update and repost comments and image collages I've posted in the past.

[–] 1 pt

Thanks for the info.

The file names do get pretty long, though.

If it works it works. I thought you had some more advanced system of categorization but sounds like long file names is the key.

👌

[–] 7 pts

Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. - Rev. 3:9 KJV

[–] 6 pts

That's so anticanaanitic of them!

[–] 4 pts

By way of an article in the Times of Israel I read once they are of their own admission Ashkenazi -- descended of Ashkenoz, grandson of Japeth (Noah's third son) and not of Shem (the Abrahamic line). We get "Sem" from the Greek due to the lack of the letter "H". So no, modern Israel is not "Semetic."

[–] 0 pt

Could you post a link?

[–] 1 pt

The Times article was several years ago. The bit about Ashkenoz is in Genesis. A good Summary of the Abrahamic line can be found in Matthew Chapter 1 and Like Chapter 3.

[–] 0 pt

So, my current understanding is that Ashkenaz was a decendent of Gomer, who was an descendant of Japheth, who was a descendant of Noah.

But that would put him as some sort of Great-Great-Grand Uncle to Abram/Abraham, and clearly not subject to any covenant God made with Abraham and his descendants, because anyone descended from Ashkenaz was clearly not descended from Abraham.

!

So the question is, where do Ashkenazi Jews claim to be descended from Ashkenoz?

Because if they are descended from Ashkenoz, that wouldn't actually be Jews/Israelites at all, since they clearly aren't descended from Abraham, and wouldn't have the covenant with God, at least not the one that promised them Israel...

[–] 2 pts

ZOMG Why is Johns Hopkins so antisemtic?!?!?!?

[–] 1 pt

Shit by any other name still smells of shit.

[–] 1 pt

Correct. And 80% of the Palestinians have Semitic blood. Although Google AI says that the current people living in Israel are related to the Israelites.

[–] 1 pt

This is so deeply anti... fuck it, antisatanic. That's what they actually mean.