For one, this is all over prospect theory literature. Check out Dan Ariely or Dan Kahneman ("availability heuristic). They are (((Israeli's))) so tread carefully ... however you can actually try the experiments yourself. Consider the daily prayer and how that works (there is reference to how this programs you in various places). Also, this is how stockholm syndrome and MK ultra programs work, by isolating the "subject" and pushing nothing but the narrative you want on them. Essentially gas-lighting. Also, read uncle Adolf's memoir where he writes about "propaganda" and how to use it to bring the masses from the "tuberculosis" state to the "my life is in immediate danger" or "cholera" state. In each case, the analogy is to take over the transmitter. You can check this experimentally yourself by completely unplugging and trying to describe something complicated or re-program yourself. Become the transmitter and receiver and you'll essentially gaslight yourself. I have done a few (controlled, with other people I live with) self experiments and took some time off work to do it. **Be careful** doing this yourself, or it will become "dis-associative" which is a kike word for perceiving things "outside of the norm." (((Psychologists))) call this a form of disorder and use technical terms like "skewed perception" to call you in on it. The trick here is to make sure you're not falling into another valley, so you're comfort that comes from resolution of the cognitive dissonance you held needs to actually resolve events and ideas MORE globally and you don't want to get stuck in an "out of the frying pan, into the fire" situation where you go from one false idea to another false idea. So, be sure to check in on your friends to make sure you can also talk things through calmly and logically. Literally have calm arguments with yourself constantly trying to test against your ideas and systematically shedding bad ideas and re-constructing sloppy ones. Sharpen over and over. People will critique you on places like this message board and one should always take (no matter how nutty) suggestions and intellectually dismantle them or adjust your theory. Some things can also be rejected as nonsense, or irrelevant to the theory and you can logically shed them as well. Once you can explain PhD concepts to the guy working behind the lunch counter unambiguously, you're probably on to something. Further, I am now finding other evidence of this idea everywhere in occult literature (which seem to correlate with spellcasting and ideas similar) and am now convinced that it has been used on humanity for many millennia. Awareness of such things I interpret as the state of "cognitive illumination." Please take what I'm saying with a little grain of salt as I am new to this realization. I've been having some success with red-pilling others now that I've re-traced my ideas several times to make sure they are logically constructed arguments. This makes my logical statements more succinct. I realize we are fickle beings and that subtle logical resets are more valuable to paradigm shifts than just having a good message. Note that in the above, I've learned to also apply that to myself.