Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I can't think of a good analogy as a small scale example but it would seem like he legally can't allow this? Legally and morally? Also the millitary that knows what happend how can thry just say ok we will be led by a compromised idiot traitor?

It would be like you are at work and some one walks in and hands you a fake piece of paper saying you are fired and thry are taking your job. Would you just take the paper walk out and let them have your job?

I can't think of a good analogy as a small scale example but it would seem like he legally can't allow this? Legally and morally? Also the millitary that knows what happend how can thry just say ok we will be led by a compromised idiot traitor? It would be like you are at work and some one walks in and hands you a fake piece of paper saying you are fired and thry are taking your job. Would you just take the paper walk out and let them have your job?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (140).
[–] • 1 pt

On its face, it really looks like the bill will place much more emphasis and resource on what we both acknowledge are largely fake hate crimes. Other antisemitism bills have tried to classify objectively true things like media control as antisemitism.

Tell me, how would you deal with the demands of the most powerful political lobby?

I don't know. I'd think the first step would be getting the public more aware of the power they have. This bill might help in that regard. I've even read accounts that blame Bush Sr.'s re-election failure on offending (((the lobby))) with a single comment.