WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Neither do the people that breathlessly declared they were so desperately needed.

Neither do the people that breathlessly declared they were so desperately needed.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

As an RRT: Just no.

I've saved a lot of lives with vents. Period.

Covid should not be vented as a tx protocol. Pussy doctors won't prescribe HCQ or Ivermeticin. <--They have the AMAs dick in their mouth.

[–] 1 pt

What's your opinion on the ? They stopped a broad study after they found it doesn't really reduce mortality:

These interim trial results show that hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir produce little or no reduction in the mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients when compared to standard of care. Solidarity trial investigators will interrupt the trials with immediate effect.

I ask that in light of your defense of intubation. I'm from Germany and we have a few pneumological specialists who advise against early switch to intubation für CoViD19. Here's one link:

I'd appreciate your response, as I am unsure what to believe and who to trust. More opinions can help me make sense of the data.

By dick you mean jew? Just for clarification purposes.

[–] 0 pt

they were specifically told not to prescribe either of those.

[–] 0 pt

They have the AMAs dick in their mouth

20+ years ago, even the kikes were against the AMA. (((Milton Friedman))) was openly against it as far back as the 1970s, and (((Seinfeld))) had an episode telling normies of the horrors of the AMA in the 1990s.

Kikery so bad that even top kikes were against it, yet still it is TPTB.

[–] 0 pt

Agreed. (another doc)

[–] 0 pt

Please see my on that.

[–] 0 pt

Indeed. Many of us have pushed back against the corrupt manuscripts that came out last year against HCQ, and we are still trying to debunk that shit. Lancetgate was a win for us but there are still corrupt doctors using the published (fake) studies to underpin their false claims that HCQ doesn't work