Whoa, whoa!
Saint Patrick was a Romanized Briton which is not a fucking Englishman, he was a Welshman. Britain was entirely ethnically celtic at that point and the native language was Common Brythonic, basically early Welsh. He obviously spoke vulgar latin which at that time was replacing the native Brythonic as the main language in southeast Britain. I assume he was also fluent in Brythonic, which at that point may have been somewhat mutually intelligible with early gaelic.
He was kidnapped and enslaved by the Gaels from western Britain to Ireland. The word Gael is derived from the Brythonic word for pirate. Apparently they made a habit of that shit. He eventually made his way back to Britain and later returned to evangelize the Gaels. There were already plenty of christians in Ireland then but he’s well known for converting the King of Leinster ( I think its Leinster?)
He helped erase the ancient culture of the Irish in favor of a foreign kike's cult which was elevated by a weak Roman emperor who betrayed his own people's ancestral heritage.
More or less. But Im not that hot on human sacrifice either. The fanatacism of the early christian saints does remind me a bit of the SJWs. Jews really do get in to the heads of the goy.
Romanized Briton which is not a fucking Englishman ... spoke vulgar latin
Fair and valid points.
My calling him an Englishman is simply in reference to him being from the landmass currently known as England, you are correct in calling this a technically inaccurate description.
The fanatacism of the early christian saints does remind me a bit of the SJWs.
I have ALWAYS compared SJWs to Christians, they operate with the same mentality of self-righteousness and desire to force people outside of their belief system to obey and pay lip service to their beliefs, to the point of destroying- by any means necessary- everything which does not conform, and patting themselves on the back as good little boys and girls for said destruction and totalitarianism.
Fuck them both, they're based on the same pathological and self-assured desire to control others.
All 3 Abrahamic religions are violent. Places like China that are communist are just an extension of Judaism since it is their creation. Jainism sounds nice. Hinduism not so bad. Just gotta watch those Asians, they go Empire on each other on the regular. They all feel righteous.
The guy who posted as tallest skil on voat mentioned in one of his more thorough black pill posts that the earliest Vedantic religion was brought to northern India by Aryans, who over the millenia mixed with the southern indians. Those Arayans were the same group who spread into europe in several different waves, mixing with Indo Europeans to create the modern ethnic groups of Europe. First through Anatolia and Greece, and later through the Ukraine into western Europe creating various groups of Celtic and Germanic peoples.
Hindu fundamentalists can be dangerous. Buddhists are generally very pacifist, but don't oppose self defense.
All 3 Abrahamic religions are violent.
All religions are somewhat violent because they have people running them. People are violent. Violence is useful. It is madness to try to eliminate all violence.
If you really dig in to Hinduism you will find fucked up stuff and definitely violence: thuggee cults, sati, and some really horrific animal sacrifice. I am not against it, but I have no illusions about its darker side.
I think its a gross overstatement to say China is a jewish creation. Really.
so i got it backwards?
Basically yes, Saint Patty brought kike-worship to Ireland, he didn't cast them out.
well damn
what's the deal with the snakes?
St.Patty is such an American thing to say, he wasn't St.Patricia ffs, it's St.Paddy. And all this makes me think that you just know how to use google search and don't really know anything else on the matter.
As a short follow-up to this, there's a tale that Saint Patrick met Oisin, last living member of the Fianna, on his deathbed. If you're not familiar with the Fianna, it's the band of warriors led by Fionn mac Cumhail (Finn McCool).
There are variations to the story, but the one I first read was that Patrick tries to convert Oisin to Christianity, saying that if he doesn't, he'll be condemned to the flames of hell.
Oisin asks him if that means the rest of the Fianna are in hell. Patrick replies that naturally, being heathens they are in hell, and again persuades Oisin to convert to save him from this fate.
Oisin then basically tells Patrick to fuck off, saying that he'd rather be in hell with his brothers than in heaven with some fuck who would cast the souls of the Fianna into the pits.
That's fucking cool. Got to love a man who stands up for their convictions.
Reminds me of this one time when my new girlfriends father offered me $250,000 cash to stop seeing her daughter and I told him to fuck off, I should have took the money, the bastard died a week later
Interesting. In all those types of stories I hear, the proaginist gets to the end, finally meats Patrick (or Columbanus) and meekly converts to christianity. It's painfully obvious how the monks recording the story just jammed it on at the end, but who knows, maybe they had no choice. They were far more resistant to abandoning their cultural heritage than most places.
Fionn isn't pronounced Finn as your google search would say, it's more like vee-un. And Oisín is spelt Oisín.
But Im not that hot on human sacrifice either.
In Minecraft, I hypothesize things would be better if the gods were appeased by sacrificing certain people.
(post is archived)