I don't know if that's a straw man, seems like a comparable assumption. To qualify as a straw man, I would have to build a false premise (something you didn't say) and refute it. Here, I'm merely using the same logic and applying it equally to something else without refuting anything to see if I can make the same conclusion. I can't. Ergo, the logic is wrong.
I don't know if that's a straw man, seems like a comparable assumption. To qualify as a straw man, I would have to build a false premise (something you didn't say) and refute it. Here, I'm merely using the same logic and applying it equally to something else without refuting anything to see if I can make the same conclusion. I can't. Ergo, the logic is wrong.
(post is archived)