Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

736

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool?

But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth.

I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory.

The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool? But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth. I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory. The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (427).
[–] • 1 pt

If you're an ant on a pool table and all you see are round objects around you, it's a logical fallacy to assume the table is round too.

Also planets aren't spheres, they are lights as proven by amateur video.

https://youtu.be/cLJVYjKIIBg

[–] • 1 pt

Sorry, doesn't compute. If I am an ant on a pool table, I am clearly not standing on a ball or claiming the other balls are flat. I would be standing on the galaxy plane if that is your equivalent.

If the earth was flat how can a round moon rotate around it without changing the distance? I have been all over the world the the size is the same. I also wore contacts and glasses at one time in my life so I understand why large moonrises exist at times.

[–] • 1 pt

They always shut down or attack as soon as a brain is turned on.

[–] • 2 pts

You sure it was on to begin with?

[–] • 0 pt

Huh? What's a "galaxy plane"?

Keyword is round. Yes the moon is round, how sure are you it's a sphere? The moon is always the same correct, never appears to rotate? It's just a miracle that it rotates at the precise same speed as earth so it always stays the same? What are the odds of that?

Who says its rotating around us, maybe its circling above us?

[–] • 2 pts

The moon does rotate. Learn science. Learn what tidal lock means.

[–] • 0 pt

If you are going to argue the sphere vs round in this context, no point in continuing this discussion.

[–] • 0 pt

Which logical fallacy is that?

[–] • 0 pt

Hasty Generalization

[–] • 0 pt

You didn't prove that. You're trying to claim false equivalence. But that does not apply. In fact, the only reasonable assumption is that the earth is round unless you can prove contrary evidence. You have none. Which means the only rational, reasonable position is that it's round like everything else. There is no evidence which even hints otherwise.

Here, pull data from orbiting sats of the earth. Just like that I've destroyed numerous talking points here: https://youtu.be/PWWGDL5tC_I

Which nicely confirms round. Opps.

You guys are silly.