Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool?

But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth.

I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory.

The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

YouTube? Logic Would dictate let a fool speak and prove himself a fool? But the king didn't cut out the tongue of the flatearther because he feared his lies he feared the truth. I am not a flat earth believer but their videos are interesting and a rational real science minded person would never get emotional and name call people for a theory and testing the theory they would just try to either replicate your test or experiments or come up with their own to prove their theory. The emotional name calling attacks from the normies against flat earth people raises red flags with me and from what I've seen the flat earth people talk and act reasonable and rational

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (427).
[–] • 0 pt

If you could prove the earth were round through observation this wouldn’t even be a conversation. But you can’t, of course.

George Orwell even wrote an essay about that in the 1940s. He said that no one would be able to tell you how they knew the earth was round.

Since then what has changed? NASA?

Don’t tell me you believe in the moon landings, ISS, and those other space hoaxes?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Get back to me when you've tesed it with science several thousand years old.

Many tests are ready. They all prove you wrong. My position is factually and empirically supported. Yours is a disproved thought experiment.

[–] • 0 pt

Get back to me when you want to have an actual debate in a devoted thread. I’m ready right now.

[–] • 0 pt

Lol. Why? I've already destroyed your every position offered here. Your solution is you now need a platform for the retardation? Wtf.

If your position is so strong I should have already been disproved. But everything you guys have offered has been completely destroyed. Followed by, "facts are, like, opinion man. And we reject facts."

You guys are silly and insane.