Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Think of it this way?

Can u believe 18 to 50 year Olds are taking this shit!

These same people if you asked them to make 2500 dollars to partake in an experimental drug trial that was in its final phase they would have said hell fucking no! Final phase aka it's basically safe after years of testing and research

Think of it this way? Can u believe 18 to 50 year Olds are taking this shit! These same people if you asked them to make 2500 dollars to partake in an experimental drug trial that was in its final phase they would have said hell fucking no! Final phase aka it's basically safe after years of testing and research

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (73).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

That's really interesting. It has me genuinely interested to learn more about Ham (particularly as the commies continue the march to making every metropolis a hardcore gulag).

Opaque does not imply that such things have no other features. Water is opaque too but it also reflects light and sound. And obviously our little yellow dot in the sky has it's own unique set of features too. These features do not necessatate being perfectly spherical solid objects do they?

What happens when you simply point the antenna at other locations in the sky - does it not reflect back to the Earth as well (I assume it does, just weaker) ? It seems then you are implying the moon is a stronger reflector of radio energy than just regular sky. And that during high sunspot activity the strength of any part of the so called ionosphre is uniformly stronger, yes ?

Have you seen the footage of high altitude rockets hitting 'space' ? And apologies, this isn't my own research but it is compelling nonetheless; and should get us to question what may really be 'space' or the ionosphere for that matter.

https://files.catbox.moe/a09e9u.mp4

Speaking to odds again, based on this circumstancial video evidence, the reflectivity properties including that of the extra reflective properties of the moon & as well as the electrical conductivity (both properties you highlight) - am inclined to assume it really is a kind of liquid up there. "Waters above" so to speak.

[–] • 0 pt

It depends, for EME I use vhf which can easily penetrate the atmosphere and reach the moon. The only other objects up there are satellites. I have a schedule of their orbits. If I time it right I can use the radios installed on them. I contact them with an up frequency and can receive on their down frequency. HF (high frequency) signals will reflect off the ionosphere and back to the earth for worldwide communication. Sunspot activity has been low for awhile but we are now entering what’s called the 25th solar cycle and activity is starting to pickup. Time of day has huge effect on this.

[–] • 0 pt

Good info.

Did it occur to you, and I'm not insinuating since I don't know myself, that there is no penetration of atmosphere but rather the moon is simply serving as a sort of lens creating a magnifying effect which allows better reflectivity off the ionosphere (aka 'dome' or 'waters above') ? And that the moon is 'in' our atmosphere; in our ecosystem? Never forget the policy of inversion employed by the people we are dealing with.

And dozing off thinking about this I woke up today with the thought, a question I wanted to ask: do you suppose there is a chance the (a) purpose of chemtrails is to block this free method of international communication? ie- to conveniently prevent radio signals from reflecting while they simeoultaneously crank up genocide to 9 ?

I have a schedule of their orbits

Not sure how extensive your schedule tracking technique is but it would be interesting to plot the locations of said 'satellites' (which may very well be helium powered blimps or drones) using the azimuthal equidistant map.