Clarify with the doctor/midwife that if it's a boy you don't want the weeny circumcised.
Circumcision was introduced in the US during the Vietnam War because getting soldiers circumcised because of penis-rot. They were circumcised before basic training which put them on 6 months of leave, I think it was.
And so the military thought "Let's just do it while they're babies and then they'll be ready for service!"
Long Story Short - Americans are 'being circumcised for a war that has been long over'. (Of course we all know it's the jews trying to mark their serfs.)
In US you have mandatory circumcision? Da fuck? So you are all a little bit kikes there?
Often the circumcision happens as part of the "Maternity" process where if you don't specify the assumed answer is "yes".
Hospital probably charges the patient for the procedure as well.
Also, penis-rot isn't a real thing.
It is but that's only because kikes are filthy bastards.
I used to be very confused how anyone would even entertain the argument of "The best way to avoid a part of the penis getting infected is to cut it off." But after seeing the bullshit that people believe without even questioning it over the past year, in not surprised anymore.
>And so the military thought "Let's just do it while they're babies and then they'll be ready for service!"
>Long Story Short - Americans are 'being circumcised for a war that has been long over'. (Of course we all know it's the jews trying to mark their serfs.)
WTF!?!? Is that true? I've never heard that before.
If you're US make sure to specify not to get your kid circumcised.
In the US, and you fucking betcha... if it's a boy, I'll be damned sure that they don't mutilate him. I haven't seen any particular issues associated with daughters.
I think the Vietnam thing is correct, that is what I've heard though I am open to being corrected.
Discussion here: https://poal.co/s/Anything/363570
(post is archived)