*Stats based with no conditional probabilities applied. If your mom doesn't have std's, you're not going to get blinded by gonnorrhea (or get hep b for that matter). I assume vitamin k has similar conditional probablities that aren't applied and refuse it on the grounds the medical system is lazy, corrupt, and unwilling to consider politically incorrect facts in their calculations. If the preventative treatment is automatic, I'm out.
In a cucked hospital you can't refuse vitamin k for any reason except religious exemption. Make sure you say it's against your religion and is a private matter you don't discuss with people outside your religion. Throw a few oy veys their way to scare them into anti semitic submission
>If your mom doesn't have stds.
The general medical consensus is women lie about whoring around so better safe than sorry. So yes, by stats-based medicine we just assume the worst.
What is the harm if applied? Just like vit C, no issues if too much so do it.
Apart from the damage caused by the needle and the pain, there might not be any. There might be a lot too, I just don't know. Skipping it is a minor risk which can be reduced by oral supplements.
How do you give oral supplements to a newborn?
(post is archived)