Is it weird that they only talk per capita when we point out that cops kill more whites? But they use absolute numbers to compare Muslim terror? Isnt that weird?

[–] • 8 pts

It always comes back to fast food, which kills more people than basically anything.

Do we spend trillions combating the deaths caused by fast food? Nope.

Do we pay astroturfers to promote healthy diets and be "anti-fast food"? Nope.

Other than Poal, which is actually looking pretty good, rn, everything people tell you on the Internet is because someone was paid to say it. Everything on your screens and speakers is part of a transaction where you are the unaware target.

So... is it weird? No. It's worse. It's dishonest, immoral, unethical and part of a coordinated attack against the citizenry to rob them of freedom, wealth and opportunity.

It's seditious. It's hostile. It's time you pushed back.

For this reason, I always recommend you specify who "they" are. Names are great. Examples are great.

If you do this, us other Poal visitors can look into the specifics more deeply, ourselves. We can prepare our argument for others or we can heckle them... for the people who don't want to go much further than their keyboard.

But... if you find a real big asshole... let's just say karma can be a bitch, when properly aimed.

For example...

https://news.northeastern.edu/2020/07/16/the-research-is-clear-white-people-are-not-more-likely-than-black-people-to-be-killed-by-police/

We've got Northeastern. We've got Matt Miller. We've got Ian Thomsen. We've got the gatekeeping WaPo...

Overall, close to 1,000 people are shot to death by police officers in the U.S. every year, according to a database maintained by The Washington Post.

WaPo and I are great friends. They never publish any evidence I give them. They say... "Give it to the FBI"... and then I say... "Oh... so they can leak it to you?" Those faggots.

Picking on schools is easy. Matt Miller is clearly a propagandist in that he only analyzed two years of data. WTF?

I actually don't know the numbers, off the top of my head, in regards to police shootings, but I'm pretty sure my understanding was the opposite of what Matt Miller wants people to believe.

So, the first thing I ask myself is... "Is the author sincere?" Generally, no, especially since the author likely did not choose the story or the slant and was likely served an outline and then the writing edited afterwards. If the author is not sincere, then I ask, "What agenda is this promoting?"

Et cetera, et cetera.

Point being, there is nothing stopping you or any other Poal user from sharing your own point of view with these people. Honestly, you'd be surprised that nobody ever pushes back and many live in echo chambers. They don't know you exist, sometimes.

This is what this retard says about Trump's (factually correct, I believe) statement.

“He is using the truth to tell a lie,” Miller says of Trump.

Email: <ma.miller@northeastern.edu>

Phone: 617.373.2087

What I generally look for is malicious intent.

Miller participated in a Northeastern-Harvard data-driven study that combed through shooting deaths by police across 27 states in 2014-15

Voila. What kind of professor cherry picks states and years? This is the hallmark of the dishonest "science" that brings us where we are today. Nobody is telling these assholes what's up.

You can even write your own opposing article and submit it... Jessica Hair at <j.hair@northeastern.edu> or 617-373-5718.

Ian Thomsen looks to be as queer as a three dollar bill.

https://muckrack.com/ian-thomsen

Look at what he is plugged into.

These little media cells can easily be intelligence assets; sometimes wittingly or unwittingly. It requires experience to differentiate which factions are which until you know what drives them. They all agree on certain things, like they won't break the Owl/Minerva rule. But, a Johnson & Johnson shill isn't going to react much to an Epstein/Clinton post.

A shill for Israel will have a different set of rules compared to a shill for the Pentagon or a shill for Wal-Mart.

Once you can kind of understand their differences, you can probe shills using their own tactics, then see if they react to an Epstein post, a vaccine post, etc.

I'm not going to spend too much time on these people... I just wanted to show you my thought process in case others may benefit.

I'd say CIA "Political Activities Group" or whatever that section is calling itself, now. (They have a signature reduction strategy where they're always changing names) Probably triggered by a light conservative breeze. In the closet? Probably. He's not even a Hunter Thompson wannabe. He's a Hunter Thompson wannabe wannabe.

News @ Northeastern, CNN, The New York Times, NBA.com, Phys.org, Bleacher Report, Sports Illustrated, ABS-CBN Sports+Action, Medical Xpress, The Athletic, Tech Xplore, Kirkus Reviews, India New England News, Knowridge Science Report

It always comes back to fast food, which kills more people than basically anything. Do we spend trillions combating the deaths caused by fast food? Nope. Do we pay astroturfers to promote healthy diets and be "anti-fast food"? Nope. Other than Poal, which is actually looking pretty good, rn, everything people tell you on the Internet is because someone was paid to say it. Everything on your screens and speakers is part of a transaction where you are the unaware target. So... is it weird? No. It's worse. It's dishonest, immoral, unethical and part of a coordinated attack against the citizenry to rob them of freedom, wealth and opportunity. It's seditious. It's hostile. It's time you pushed back. For this reason, I always recommend you specify who "they" are. Names are great. Examples are great. If you do this, us other Poal visitors can look into the specifics more deeply, ourselves. We can prepare our argument for others or we can heckle them... for the people who don't want to go much further than their keyboard. But... if you find a real big asshole... let's just say karma can be a bitch, when properly aimed. For example... https://news.northeastern.edu/2020/07/16/the-research-is-clear-white-people-are-not-more-likely-than-black-people-to-be-killed-by-police/ We've got Northeastern. We've got Matt Miller. We've got Ian Thomsen. We've got the gatekeeping WaPo... >Overall, close to 1,000 people are shot to death by police officers in the U.S. every year, according to a database maintained by The Washington Post. WaPo and I are great friends. They never publish any evidence I give them. They say... "Give it to the FBI"... and then I say... "Oh... so they can leak it to you?" Those faggots. Picking on schools is easy. Matt Miller is clearly a propagandist in that he only analyzed two years of data. WTF? I actually don't know the numbers, off the top of my head, in regards to police shootings, but I'm pretty sure my understanding was the opposite of what Matt Miller wants people to believe. So, the first thing I ask myself is... "Is the author sincere?" Generally, no, especially since the author likely did not choose the story or the slant and was likely served an outline and then the writing edited afterwards. If the author is not sincere, then I ask, "What agenda is this promoting?" Et cetera, et cetera. Point being, there is nothing stopping you or any other Poal user from sharing your own point of view with these people. Honestly, you'd be surprised that nobody ever pushes back and many live in echo chambers. They don't know you exist, sometimes. This is what this retard says about Trump's (factually correct, I believe) statement. >“He is using the truth to tell a lie,” Miller says of Trump. Email: ma.miller@northeastern.edu Phone: 617.373.2087 What I generally look for is malicious intent. >Miller participated in a Northeastern-Harvard data-driven study that combed through shooting deaths by police across 27 states in 2014-15 Voila. What kind of professor cherry picks states and years? This is the hallmark of the dishonest "science" that brings us where we are today. Nobody is telling these assholes what's up. You can even write your own opposing article and submit it... Jessica Hair at j.hair@northeastern.edu or 617-373-5718. Ian Thomsen looks to be as queer as a three dollar bill. https://muckrack.com/ian-thomsen Look at what he is plugged into. These little media cells can easily be intelligence assets; sometimes wittingly or unwittingly. It requires experience to differentiate which factions are which until you know what drives them. They all agree on certain things, like they won't break the Owl/Minerva rule. But, a Johnson & Johnson shill isn't going to react much to an Epstein/Clinton post. A shill for Israel will have a different set of rules compared to a shill for the Pentagon or a shill for Wal-Mart. Once you can kind of understand their differences, you can probe shills using their own tactics, then see if they react to an Epstein post, a vaccine post, etc. I'm not going to spend too much time on these people... I just wanted to show you my thought process in case others may benefit. I'd say CIA "Political Activities Group" or whatever that section is calling itself, now. (They have a signature reduction strategy where they're always changing names) Probably triggered by a light conservative breeze. In the closet? Probably. He's not even a Hunter Thompson wannabe. He's a Hunter Thompson wannabe wannabe. News @ Northeastern, CNN, The New York Times, NBA.com, Phys.org, Bleacher Report, Sports Illustrated, ABS-CBN Sports+Action, Medical Xpress, The Athletic, Tech Xplore, Kirkus Reviews, India New England News, Knowridge Science Report

link

(post is archived)