Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

805

We all know that big pharma was given a hall pass that theoretically shields them from any and all liability arising from vaccine side effects. My question is how do they expect this to stand up in court of law? Politicians pass unconstitutional laws all the time... this is fundamental to the checks and balances system between out three branches of government. The legislative branch can pass any law they want and if the law is not constitutional the path to justice for the public is to take the government to court. If the court does it's job properly the law (or parts of the law) is struck down.

The 14th amendment mandates that the law must be applied equally to everyone. So isn't a law that makes some laws not apply to some people a violation of this? The legislative branch has no authority to grant immunity. How is there any expectation that the Vaccine Liability Immunity will stand up in court?

We all know that big pharma was given a hall pass that theoretically shields them from any and all liability arising from vaccine side effects. My question is how do they expect this to stand up in court of law? Politicians pass unconstitutional laws all the time... this is fundamental to the checks and balances system between out three branches of government. The legislative branch can pass any law they want and if the law is not constitutional the path to justice for the public is to take the government to court. If the court does it's job properly the law (or parts of the law) is struck down. The 14th amendment mandates that the law must be applied equally to everyone. So isn't a law that makes some laws not apply to some people a violation of this? The legislative branch has no authority to grant immunity. How is there any expectation that the Vaccine Liability Immunity will stand up in court?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (41).
[–] • 2 pts

I'm amused that people are confused about inconsistencies in the political system, as if they think there should be some sort of answer there. The entire political system is kabuki now (((and probably has been for a long time.))) Debating the legislative branch vs. the executive vs. the judiciary is like discussing deck chairs on the Titanic. There's only one branch of government and that's the jew branch.