Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

431

Genuine question here. If you’re smoking, why waste any of it out the window when you can trap it in your car?

If it’s so your car doesn’t smell like smoke, that’s not real because your car will still smell like smoke. (Source: Worked in the car service business and saw a lot of smokers’ cars.)

Genuine question here. If you’re smoking, why waste any of it out the window when you can trap it in your car? If it’s so your car doesn’t smell like smoke, that’s not real because your car will still smell like smoke. (Source: Worked in the car service business and saw a lot of smokers’ cars.)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (120).
[–] • 1 pt

Ah. I get it. The majority of the nicotine is absorbed on the initial inhale. Didn’t know that. Thought the absorption was uniform with the uptake rate of oxygen, which it clearly must not be. Thanks.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

But wait I dont get it. If you clam bake in a car the only way I see to get the nicotine into the car would be through through the upholstery, but it's not enough.

So we should put nicotine patches on the dash board and the seats. Then everything eventually evens out.

There must be as mathematical equation for this phenomenon. I like science, my turtle isnt a turtle it's a tortoise.

The door on my car is not a door, it's a jar, ajar. My car actually said this too me, so I know empirically that this is a truism.

Most mechanics say their cars like camels, the smooth flavor will improve your gas mileage.

[–] • 0 pt

It would be interesting to determine how much nicotine remains in the exhaled smoke versus the inhaled amount before absorption. There may be information on this somewhere, but I'm not sure if there has been any research or studies on this particular topic. If it is a high enough level, then perhaps a concentrator would allow for rebreathing the used smoke and getting more out of it. It might be more possible and practical for vaping though since you can condense the vapor back to a liquid and re-vaporize it. Vape enthusiasts would hate it though if they couldn't make mad clouds and waste their juice quickly doing so.

[–] • 0 pt

Wow. That makes a lot of sense. And I bet there is data on this.

But vaping flat out makes you a faggot, so let's just not go there.