Assuming your doctor's explanation is accurate the situation is even more hilarious than I thought. It means that the vaccine -- which isn't a vaccine -- isn't for the actual virus but rather for a model of what we think the virus is. Fucking. Hilarious.
That’s exactly what it is. The CDC has admitted they had no biological samples and based the tests on “contrived” (their word) models. Further, all the gene sequences they contrived happen to already exist numerous times in both the human genome and in common microbes. (I assume delta sequences also exist already too.) This would explain the cases of getting positive results from papayas and the like. The genetic sequences aren’t novel.
Thus, any samples have a nonzero probability of testing positive with high enough amplification samples. That probability increases for sick people, as dead cells dump their genetic material into the fluid samples. So we have experts like Robert Malone saying the positive tests among the vaccinated are evidence of ADE. But it could also be evidence that there is a lot of cellular death going on in those people.
>Assuming your doctor's explanation is accurate the situation is even more hilarious than I thought. It means that the vaccine -- which isn't a vaccine -- isn't for the actual virus but rather for a model of what we think the virus is. Fucking. Hilarious.
Yes it's a fucking unbelievable.
Which is exactly why it takes years to develop a vaccine and why it was a foolish decision to rush it into people. Yet I am a monster (social pariah) for not wanting to inject myself with something that the experts do not fully understand to combat something that the experts do not fully understand. Unbelievable.
(post is archived)