>I guess you don't know the history
And you're starting with the premise that I'm dumber than you here... BIG MISTAKE my friend...
There's no question jews played a role in the build up of the soviet union and the build up of china
Now the episode you're missing here, is stalin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin_and_antisemitism#Doctors'_plot
Similar purges against Jews were organised in Eastern Bloc countries, such as with the Prague Trials. During this time, Soviet Jews were dubbed as persons of Jewish ethnicity. A dean of Marxism–Leninism department at one of Soviet universities explained the policy to his students: "One of you asked if our current political campaign can be regarded as antisemitic. Comrade Stalin said: "We hate Nazi not because they are Germans, but because they brought enormous suffering to our land. Same can be said about the Jews."[51] It has also been said that at the time of Stalin's death, "no Jew in Russia could feel safe."[52] Throughout this time, the Soviet media avoided overt antisemitism and continued to report the punishment of officials for antisemitic behavior.[53]
Alright?
So don't give me your "I guess you don't know the history" while your actual historical knowledge is obviously quite shallow here
Now when it comes to china, you forget they were at odds with russia, for territorial reasons, especially under stalin, it wasn't really all rosy to say the least. They deemed soviet russia more imperialistic than the US, hence, the rapprochement between US and china under nixon.
And today, there's no indication that jews are in control of china, if anything the belt and road initiative spells doom for them
In blue the actual trade routes, in black the BRI
Thanks for the info. I will check it out more. Always happy to get more accurate info.
There's another side of the story, it's the middle east/east asia dilemma; you can't confront china in east asia AND handle the middle east at the same time, it's just too much, even for the US army. There's probably 2 schools of thought in the war party, one thinking the east asia is the priority while the other thinks middle east is the priority
And I believe trump served the the former first, while accommodating the latter. I know it sounds counter intuitive but think about what he did. He essentially made good bye gifts to israel (jerusalem) and arranged a deal between sauds and israel, a defense partnership giving them more autonomy. Meanwhile he shifted the military toward east asia, trying to leave syria and afghanistan behind. And if you look at what biden does, except for the syrian part, it's mostly the continuity of what trump started, there's no substantial change
https://www.beltroad-initiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/World-Map-Basis_sRGB.jpg
.svg/1200px-East_Asia_(orthographic_projection).svg.png){kind=link}
.svg/1920px-Middle_East_(orthographic_projection).svg.png){kind=link}
I did notice Biden kept trumps moves in motion.
It probably means trump was an insider the whole time and not that Biden is a convert.
(post is archived)