Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I hear a lot of people saying global warming is a scam, it’s fake, or whatever.

Many of them point to record low temperatures and others mention that temperature data is being fudged to make it seem like it’s real. This could be possible. I’m currently undecided on the whole thing.

But how do you explain the melting glaciers? These are things you can see with your own eyes and know to be true. For instance look at old pictures of glacier national park and compare it to today. Also a ski resort based on a glacier in Bolivia literally had to shut down because the 18,000 year old glacier on it melted. You can go there and see it with your own eyes to verify.

I hear a lot of people saying global warming is a scam, it’s fake, or whatever. Many of them point to record low temperatures and others mention that temperature data is being fudged to make it seem like it’s real. This could be possible. I’m currently undecided on the whole thing. But how do you explain the melting glaciers? These are things you can see with your own eyes and know to be true. For instance look at old pictures of glacier national park and compare it to today. Also a ski resort based on a glacier in Bolivia literally had to shut down because the 18,000 year old glacier on it melted. You can go there and see it with your own eyes to verify.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (41).
[–] • 0 pt

Ice may be less in some areas, but it is more in other places so there is actually more total ice worldwide. The 2009 E-mail scandal blew open the fraud. They were manipulating the data in fraud. First off, the pro GW scientists were being paid off by big oil. Royal Dutch Shell and wealthy people who they say, "don't write his name but you know who". They were using "Mike's nature trick to hide the decline" Science isn't supposed to hide things. They were hiding the raw data that showed a 90 year DECLINE in temperature and turned it into an INCLINE. Straight up fraud. Mike is Michael Mann, the professor and NASA guy who created the fraudulent "Hockey Stick" graph that was totally debunked. His "nature trick" to hide the decline was to claim that the new digital thermometers were soooo much more accurate than the old analog ones that they had to go back and alter all the data. They never said how much but it should be one coefficient, say 1.5 degrees warmer. That means the whole raw data chart would bump up 1.5 degrees but wouldn't change it from decline to incline. That means they had big + adjustments on one side with big - adjustments on the other side so the chart could flip like a see saw. Here is a breakdown of them. It's 180 page summary and the different scientists are in different colors. https://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/greenhouse-science/climate-change/climategate-emails.pdf https://www.climatedepot.com/ I used to have links to some really good sites on my old computer but I can't remember the names.

[–] • 0 pt

Also, in the 70's there was something like 6,000+ temperature stations around the world. They reduced it to a couple of hundred so they could use averages and straight up lies. There no is no station in the high mountains in Boliva so they average from the closest one, on a beach in Peru. There is no station at the top of the Sierra Madres in California anymore so they average from the one at LAX that is inbetween the runways. The other one in Cali is also in an airport. They put stations literally outside of commercial grade A/C units, literally a few feet away from the heat vents. They have planned to tax "carbon" for a long time. It is a scheme to tax our very exhale. Total scam paid for by the wealthy jewish elite.