If it was the result of a virus then yes, it is fair to say the secondary pneumonia was from it; but if it’s from the drug, then it’s completely dishonest. It’s unfortunate that so many doctors trust these pharmaceutical companies. If they (or the heads of the hospitals) actually read these studies then they’d know. They aren’t in a position to claim ignorance on these types of thing in my opinion.
If it was the result of a virus then yes, it is fair to say the secondary pneumonia was from it; but if it’s from the drug, then it’s completely dishonest. It’s unfortunate that so many doctors trust these pharmaceutical companies. If they (or the heads of the hospitals) actually read these studies then they’d know. They aren’t in a position to claim ignorance on these types of thing in my opinion.
(post is archived)