Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

220

I know why because the jews didn't start the propaganda until about 1973 I think

I know why because the jews didn't start the propaganda until about 1973 I think

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts

Didn't enter an encyclopedia until a Jew purchased one and forced it into it.

Previous to this it only provided the original Greek definition and reference, which means, "whole burnt offering."

Which if you think about is very strange. As it implies the Nazi were offering Jews as a sacrifice to a god. Of course Jews don't push that. Why would it even be called The Holocaust?

[–] • 16 pts

Could it be because jews sacrificed us in a world war to their satanic deity?

[–] • 11 pts

This is exactly it, WW1 and WW2 in their entirety were the holocausts. No more brother wars.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

Russians are NOT my enemies! That seems to be the latest brother war they want to push.

[–] • 4 pts

Inversion. Hmm. Something to think about.

[–] • 3 pts

I thought a rabbi in the Talmud say 6 millions jews need to die for jews to return to isreal. I don't know the exact quote

[–] • 4 pts

Yes. It had religious significance to them. They have been using 6,000,000 since the mid 1850s.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Because an actual holocaust happened to the German people and the jews, being jews, look at it like it's their feast. Something they want to actively deny the goyim. It's theirs. Even though the suffering actually befell the German/European people.

[–] • 2 pts

It has another meaning, it's a jewish ritual. I posted a picture of the page of an unabridged dictionary from '43, with the definition. Was interesting to learn, it was actually the first word I looked up in it when I found the thing.

[–] • 1 pt

Exactly! It annoys me everytime I hear that word in that context. Filty liars.

[–] • 6 pts

IIRC "holocaust" was first used in a book talking about the firebombing of germans. This would actually make sense since they died in fire. I don't even know why the jews called their story the holocaust; i guess it is the same as "semitic" or the hundreds of other things they do that are lies.

[–] • 5 pts

This why ovens are an important part of the story. Both the concept of being purged by fire and the '6 million' number come from their religious teachings and predate the war.

[–] • 4 pts

Because ovens make for a great , unverifiable (where are the bodies??) Story.

[–] • 2 pts

Still leaves all the bones. That's what the "ashes" are, the bones ground up.

[–] • 4 pts

And yet they won't let anyone analyze the soil at Auschwitz for disruptions, weird. An army loosing the upper hand would never use the amount of fuel it takes to burn 6 million bodies, they'd be using it to fuel tanks and manufacture more bullets. A bulldozer and trenches are a time tested cost effective way to dispose of corpses.

If you live on a farm and your horse dies are you going to use 100 gallons of diesel to burn it's corpse or use 2 gallons to dig a hole to bury it? I am baffled by anyone stupid enough to believe this kike dreamt fantasy concocted 40 years after ww2.

[–] • 0 pt

As long as you pave over where the remains are buried...

[–] • 6 pts

Do you know how tall the ashes of 2M people at auschwitz would be?

[–] • 1 pt

Thay project their crimes onto their victims. Just like how they say nigger pharaohs enslaved jews in Egypt.

[–] • 5 pts

Churchill wrote a huge 5-volume series about WW2, it got a Nobel Prize in 1952. It makes zero mention of muh holofraud. No ovens, no masturbation machines...nothing.

[–] • 5 pts

I have a history book from 1967, the word 'holocaust' is not in it.

[–] • 2 pts

Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein's book 'The Holocaust Industry' pin points it to the 6 day war in 1967. I suspect it would take a couple of years to get it into the books.

[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Not sure the point of your screenshot, it's still not in my history book. Modern screencap in context of modern revisionism is not exactly compelling, for either side.

[–] • 4 pts

Because the 60s was when the jews started moving the pieces into place for what we face today. The holocaust was a key piece to set in place. It made jews a permanent victim class and provided them a highly effective psychological weapon to use against gentiles. The holocaust is the foundation on which everything is built.

[–] • 3 pts

The original Hogan's Heroes featured a cast with a number of Jews who were in the camps. Watch the show and watch interviews with the cast and not one of them mention anything about extermination or gas chambers or anything.

[–] • 1 pt

People born after, I don't know 1965 or so, look at Hogan's Heroes and say "what the fuck were they thinking making a sitcom about Nazi death camps? Wasn't there a huge outcry?" The answer from the older folks "We didn't know at the time." Nobody knew anything about people being exterminated in these camps? Then how do we know now? This could be a soft-handed introductiom to the truth about the holohoax.

[–] • 0 pt

True. There are a lot of vectors into dispelling the myth, but people have to be open to it, and it's usually better handled in one on one conversation in order to ease people into the subject without triggering the ausistic screeching brought on by decades of brainwashing.

Back to the show though, the bios of the Jewish cast are pretty interesting. Even though obviously most of us here are opposed to the Allied cause, the stories from the cast make for good reading/watching. My favorite is John Banner insisting that Schultz be a typical German conscript who was just in it for a paycheck and didn't really want to be a part of the politics behind the war.

[–] • 2 pts

My dictionary from 1943 mentions it. It's a jewish ritual.

https://files.catbox.moe/2gu1so.jpg

The key is to find the unabridged dictionaries, they're radically larger and more complete.

[–] • 2 pts

There was a world wide "revision" in 1956, and before that there was one about 1920... during these "agreements" they just full on change history. It's eye opening to say the least when you see an encyclopedia from 1890 back. I'm not even slightly surprised that they added the holohoax in the 70s.

[–] • 2 pts

they did. show one that didnt

[–] • 3 pts

proving a negative is not possible; you will just say "obviously that one wouldn't have it, try again".

[–] • 2 pts

Exactly, it would be far easier to show one that did, if they did

[–] • 2 pts

Are you joking... I was in a coffee shop and with a friend. There was a bunch of encyclopedias... he didn't believe me that auswitz and the halacaust where not in them after he looked in 3 different ones all pre 1968 he was like what the fuck!.. he said it had to have pages dedicated to them? Nope nothing Mayne 1 sentence about burnt offerings that's about it

[–] • 1 pt

I also stand corrected. I had forgotten to upload. Here they are. Was also a bit confused as both an encyclopedia and dictionary was referenced.

https://poal.co/s/History/480883

[–] • 0 pt

Someone linked one in this comment chain. Pictures of an encyclopedia. Didn't have it in there.

Load more (5 replies)