Please name one bias needed to disregard the moonlanding. Ill wait.
Reread it, Mr. Reading-Comprehension. I literally said it requires confirmation bias. If you want an example of that, you can look into the Van Allen radiation belts which fake moon landing fans claim are super hazardous and fatal, but which are actually fairly safe to pass through in almost all metal spacecraft.
Yet there are actual nasa scientists and astronauts saying its impregnable with current tech...?
Yeah, well I worked with a few design engineers that said my patents wouldn't work but yet they somehow made it into production.
I’d love to hear their explanations for that.
Here’s a contrary viewpoint showing that the belts are relatively easily traversable.
literally confirmation bias super
You young people might have good points but you sound like NPCs.
(post is archived)