Nukes aren't real is another one of those conspiracies. Proponents of the theory allege that it's a con, and nukes are actually really big fuel/air bombs.
Why are the Marshall islands irradiated then?
How come the wildlife in Chernobyl isn't horribly irradiated mutants? Fukushima? Maybe you misunderstand what radiation actually is. How it actually affects you, and why this information is kept secret. Do you have any idea how much nuclear material is worth? Do you know that so called nuclear waste is the only way to make these materials? Plutonium for example is a byproduct of uranium fission, is plutonium cheap and easy to produce? What would you do to protect that plutonium since it's worth a nice chunk of cash? Or that cesium that's used in smoke detectors, or cobalt 60 that's used irradiate and sterilize your Chiquita bananas?.
The natural life cycle of many animals is too short to significantly have issues. Contrary to comics, most mutations effect embryos which are aborted. Those that live past birth are usually quickly consumed by predators or simply die shortly after birth.
Most (all?) smoke detectors no longer use cesium; see nuclear boy scout.
Humans currently live there too. So long as they are not consuming food (some are) from the contaminated areas, they shouldn't have issues.
Long term tumor risks over an 80-100 human lifespan is not the same as a 3-8 year lifespan common to many wild animals. Predation is an important aspect of natural wildlife life cycles.
All of which ignores, there are multiple radiation exposure models. We use the zero threshold model even though it's completely wrong. It's used because it's extremely conservative. Additionally, the other models require refinement, which requires human subjects.
And Chernobyl isn't a nuclear bomb. Nuclear reactors only have a 2% ~ 5% mix of U235/238 (might have the order wrong; less than 5% of the radioactive isotope). Bombs are near 95%, or "highly enriched uranium" .. which would likely have less radiation in the aftermath than a nuclear plan since everything would be consumed in the detonation ... but everything would be dead for obviously other reasons.
they're probably fine
Dirty fuel air bombs.
I'm not able to answer any of the many, reasonable questions the theory raises.
Dirty bomb testing.
Dirty bombs don't remove island chains.
They aren't, lol.
Why did the Japs rebuild Hiroshima and Nagasaki IMMEDIATELY after the war? No radiation, that's why. Millions live there today, none have three heads or green skin.
to what end though?
It serves two purposes.
Discredit white technological accomplishments
Discredit "conspiracies" and facilitate gas lighting
Examples:
Whites never did anything but steal technology from everyone. Space is fake and gay and nukes are not real.
And
You flat earth retard, there are no nazis in Ukraine
So just another cointelpro special.
No nazis in Ukraine... why do you think they call them "not sees". There everywhere, just ask anyone who criticizes israhell.
Whites are the master race but you need to understand that the federal government had a plan to fake nuclear weapons in the event that they could not get it to work there was never a plan to fake the moon landing.
They claim it was to put the world in fear, usher in the cold war era, and as a cash cow for military spending because it would help justify over spending when the stakes are so high. Also to grant Israel deterrence from its surrounding enemies thanks to their fake nukes.
I guess that is not totally unreasonable. But i think the evidence available lends itself to probability that they actually exist now.
Why do frogs jump? Why do birds fly?
>Why do frogs jump?
No one wants to be turned gay, man, didn't you know?
retards gonna shitpost, got it.
Frogs are gay
I don't know.
Same end as the space is fake and gay people
Same as flat earth, or Moon hoax.
They don't believe, and work backwards from there
Not true. Everyone I know, including myself believed the moon landings were real for pretty much our entire lives. Once we opened our minds to the evidence, we all concluded the whole moon thing is fake as fuck. Anyone who OBJECTIVELY looks at the evidence will come to the conclusion it’s not real. So after looking at the evidence those who claim we went to the moon must do mental gymnastics of epic proportions to cling to the propaganda and psychological warfare they have succumbed too. It is far easier to fool a man than to convince him he has been fooled. The earths not flat.
(post is archived)