WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I had just been banned from some website, I forget which, and was in a foul mood. How 'Anus Expander' popped into my head, I don't know. Just felt nasty enough to be right for my mood. I figured I would be banned soon anyway, on Reddit I was banned dozens of times for wrongthink.

I am not a fan of anal anything. And I'm certainly not a homosexual. I do regret the name in hindsight, but muh internet points...I'M TOO OLD TO CHANGE!

-- I think legendary Reddit user Potato_In_My_Anus may have been my inspiration. I just don't remember.

EDIT: y'awlz sure expanded muh inbox...and I liked it.

I had just been banned from some website, I forget which, and was in a foul mood. How 'Anus Expander' popped into my head, I don't know. Just felt nasty enough to be right for my mood. I figured I would be banned soon anyway, on Reddit I was banned dozens of times for wrongthink. I am not a fan of anal anything. And I'm certainly not a homosexual. I do regret the name in hindsight, but muh internet points...I'M TOO OLD TO CHANGE! -- I think legendary Reddit user Potato_In_My_Anus may have been my inspiration. I just don't remember. EDIT: y'awlz sure expanded muh inbox...and I liked it.

(post is archived)

[–] 23 pts

Being a Christian, I’m not a fan of Ayn Rand’s Objectivist (((militant atheist))) dogma. However, I found something soothing and inspiring about Galt’s Gulch. I used to reread that section of the book on occasion and imagine such a place.

Galt, himself, represents an idealized man, a superhero or demigod of liberated thinking, a man of pure reason, an image toward which one can aspire. He is diligent and good, hard working and plainspoken. He understands the broken world and, rather than fix it for everyone, intentionally seeks to destroy it, so as to remove the yoke of the parasites from the shoulders of the producers.

It wasn’t until later that I understood a deeper layer of the stories, one even (((Rand))), herself may not have realized consciously. The jews were represented repeatedly in the stories of The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. The villains all had jewish features, and spoke with the jew's forked tongues. They controlled industry, media and “the narrative” in her novels, and were the ultimate seekers of wealth and power at the expense of the producers and creators, and doing so exclusively through manipulation and fiction.

By contrast, Galt was the white male savior whom (((Rand))) found herself seeking and worshiping when she allowed her romantic side to emerge. Her devotion to him was a religious fervor. She craved his mind and his hands. Her biology as a woman in those moments overrode her ethnicity as a jew, and she accidentally revealed the truth: the jew envies the white man, and jew women wish their men would have chosen justice, truth and innovation over fraud, deception and perversion.

I believe “capitalism,” “free markets,” and “liberty” are good and just - for white people and white nations. However, until that homogeneity is achieved, the only answer is fascism, to crush and remove the invaders, to smash the banks, to purge the land of the evil of the jews, and to restore order - only then can these philosophies of freedom be restored.

[–] 3 pts

Galt is hot. Come over to the pagan side, leave that Judeo-Christian garbage behind lol.

[–] 1 pt

judeo-Christian

jewish lie and (((you))) know this. (((rand))) and anyone idolizing her is a willful cuck.

[–] -1 pt

I agree, Christianity is a Jewish Lie. Also someone's heritage does not discount their intellectual capacities

[–] 0 pt

Rand was a Jew.

[–] 0 pt

yeah but obviously anti-religion if you've ever read her writing. you can't control your heritage

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Have you read Fountainhead? It further proves your analysis. Howard Roark is another idealized white man in a sea of the exploitive. The love interest in that book is a spiteful and manipulative young woman who enjoys being raped by him.

[–] 1 pt

Without even reading further down the comments, I award you 'Top Commenter'.

[–] 1 pt

Fascism and capitalism are none of mutually exclusive, mutually inclusive, of the same type, or incompatible. NSDAP was capitalist, but also fascist. I honestly wish those of you who spoke these labels understood a thing about them rather than regurgitating some nonsense.

[–] 1 pt

You are right. Capitalism can exist under fascism, albeit as a “modified” form.

Fascism, however, isn’t “libertarian” (in the classical sense) nor is it “free market.” If it were, the jews would, and do, exploit it for their own gains. The fascist hand must be in use to strip the jews of their ill-gotten wealth via their years of aggressive “coin clipping” in the free market, and drive them out.

[–] 1 pt

No. Not in a modified form. In a literal form. Capitalism is anti-jew. It rewards work. jews like neither work nor rewarding anything.

Also I said NOTHING of (((libertarian))) at all. I'm not a naive IQcuck. I understand fully how jew created and controlled lolberg is and they are.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

100% exclusive.

Which you'd know if you knew economics.

Capitalism is the absence of any system. Capitalism is economicly free range humans Capitalism is individuals owning the means and methods of the means of production Capitalism is individuals fulfilling wants and needs( economics) however they see fit.

Fascism. Nsdap economic system(note not capitalism already. Hello a system is enforced upon everyone) is socialism with an extra step.

Socialism is the government owning the means of production either outright. Communism. Or through regulations and laws. Democratic socialism. Or relegating private owners to nominal owners. State Ownership by proxy. Fascism.

Every economic system deminishes capitalism because yes its generally liberty isn't all or nothing but a sliding scale.

Even the meanest communism has capitalism. Black markets. Bartering.

If a fascist like Hitler is telling people that they have to product x with their factory. It's not capitalism. If Hitler tells people they must fix their products price. It isn't capitalism

[–] 1 pt

This is exactly my interpretation of Galt also. Rand is very interesting character, a paradox in many ways, internally conflicted between a jewish progressivism and a kind of feminine traditionalism.