I don't buy the lightning theory, there's no element to support it, I don't see any lightening anywhere
There are theories, and there's the ongoing investigation, and the ongoing investigation points at explosives, why should it be lightning then? Cover up for bad weather?
https://news.yahoo.com/gbi-investigating-parts-mysterious-georgia-145853667.html
>In a statement, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said agents found evidence of an explosion at the scene. “The preliminary information indicates that unknown individuals detonated an explosive device at around 4:00 a.m. on Wednesday, July 6th. Elbert County Sheriff’s Office personnel responded to discover the explosion destroyed a large portion of the structure.”
In a statement, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said agents found evidence of an explosion at the scene. “The preliminary information indicates that unknown individuals detonated an explosive device at around 4:00 a.m. on Wednesday, July 6th. Elbert County Sheriff’s Office personnel responded to discover the explosion destroyed a large portion of the structure.
I hadn't read this article before. Must be a settled discussion if GBI says so, eh? Regardless of cause, I think destruction of the guidestones was a good thing. I am curious as to what motivated them to do it now though.
Because the GBI claiming it's explosives to provide a cover up for bad weather makes sense to you?
How?
Must be a settled discussion if GBI says so, eh?
This is dripping with sarcasm, in case you missed it.
(post is archived)