I don't see this leading to anything. This is nothing more than a calibration exercise. They will push to see how far they can push, then back off.
I don't see this leading to any famine. The worst that will happen is they pick out the organizers and kill them, like they did in Canada.
That isn't what happens though. They push until they can't push anymore but they never pull back to the original starting point. This is what incrementalism is. They are ultimately reaching their goals even though it takes longer.
If we don't start pushing them back and forcing them to cede territory then we deserve what we get.
This is what I am talking about. I didn't say they back off all the way. Just enough to release pressure.
They will push to see how far they can push, then back off. I don't see this leading to any famine.
What ceases to attack you, causes what you are pushing against, to vanish. It is hard to affect change when the thing you are fighting becomes immaterial.
In order to break this pattern the dutch would have to push back against their government, but also have covert organizations in place, with some element of power. The insider element's jobs would be to continue to attack the public well after ordered to back off, effectively creating a splinter faction.
In other words, to win, the dutch public would, by subterfuge, have to affect an assault upon itself while blaming the government once the government attempts to back off it's own failing policy exercises.
(post is archived)