Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

So the nig that can't understand how he would feel if he hadn't eaten breakfast this morning, because "but I did eat breakfast", actually believes Wakanda is a real place because he saw it in a movie which framed it as though it were a real place.

How could one distinguish a hypothetical scenario in a movie from reality if he lacks the capacity for abtract thought?

So the nig that can't understand how he would feel if he hadn't eaten breakfast this morning, because "but I did eat breakfast", actually believes Wakanda is a real place because he saw it in a movie which framed it as though it were a real place. How could one distinguish a hypothetical scenario in a movie from reality if he lacks the capacity for abtract thought?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (36).
[–] • 4 pts

That is funny but it's worse than that. They've convinced a generation that using your fifth amendment right or asking for a lawyer means your guilty, that DNA and fingerprinting are infallible and that you can "zoom and enhance" pictures, which the prosecution literally tried to use in the Rittenhouse case.

Luckily the judge was tech savvy enough to call them on it but I'm sure many other people weren't so lucky and went to prison wrongly because of the misinformation on those shows.

[–] • 1 pt

Doesn't help when the defense has grainy 40dpi photos and the cops have 8k Hi res picts from every angle including shots from multiple drones they fail to mention.