I don't have studies or time to find them for you but the main thing is resisting the schedule, vaccines work the problem is how.
Vaccines need to trigger an immune response and that's why they had mercury and formaldehyde and newer ones have aluminum. The problem with vaccine adjuvants is that most of them seem to have additional neurological effects and that a metal adjuvant can only be considered remotely safe if exposure is low, this risk was acceptable 50 years ago when there were ~8 vaccines on schedule over ~9 years but now its something around 70 vaccines on schedule over 18 years and 80% are front loaded.
Vaccine Adjuvants need to be revaluated in the context of the bloated schedule but also the immune response produced by the weakened virus the MMR isn't supposed to have a high adjuvant concentration but it does have a massive viral load of 3 separate crippled infectious agents and it is the most associated with behavioural changes in infants and toddlers.
The best strategy is to take the necessary inoculations that reduce childhood mortality most drastically but stretch them out over time and reject the schedule but not the evidence that they work.
In a sentence I can prove vaccines work: India isn't experiencing a perpetual polio outbreak despite a half billion swimming in a shit filled river and walking barefoot on shit covered streets every year.
Yes new cleanliness standards dramatically reduced polio before the salk vaccine but much of the third world never adopted these practices and the salk and later the oral powders which caused outbreaks vaccine saved them from further polio outbreaks through mass inoculation.
To be clear you should only fuck with an injection or tamper with the immune system if absolutely necessary or if longstanding clinical data indicates risk levels better than 1 in 100,000.
And never let doctors push you around.
Thank you for the info
(post is archived)