WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

350

Imho there's a lot of bullshit stories about what happened. So if someone wouldn't mind, please explain where was the shooter positioned, who really was the shooter and what's that old guy role shouting it was him? And please gtfo with (((stories))) about how he was shot from the front and how his body armor deflected the bullet or bs like this.

Imho there's a lot of bullshit stories about what happened. So if someone wouldn't mind, please explain where was the shooter positioned, who really was the shooter and what's that old guy role shouting it was him? And please gtfo with (((stories))) about how he was shot from the front and how his body armor deflected the bullet or bs like this.
[–] 2 pts

No one who doesn't have actual and verifiable facts about the course of events and the players in the story can give you a plausible reconstruction. You reject the stories others have already put out so you are just searching for a version of the story that you can agree with, be it based in fact or fiction. We just don't have the facts yet and we may never so postulating on the matter is essentially just being the author of fan-fiction. This will likely be the JFK of the modern times and we still don't have the facts after decades of digging.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

wrong I don't follow narratives but what i've seen on videos: the bullet entered below his right ear, hence the shooter-from-the-front-story is bs. And it is awfully suspicious how quickly stories and even 3D reconstruction animations came out about the front shooter narrative, muddying the waters almost instantly.

[–] 2 pts

wrong I don't follow narratives but what i've seen on videos: the bullet entered below his right ear, hence the shooter-from-the-front-story is bs. And it is awfully suspicious how quickly stories and even 3D reconstruction animations came out about the front shooter narrative, muddying the waters almost instantly.

Okay, write your own 'plausible reconstruction' then.

[–] 0 pt

Since he was shot from the side the shooter had to be positioned accordingly. The old man distracted the crowd to bundle focus on him. I'm not as much as an autist and don't have the time to try to actually figure sth out but for sure people who believe the front-shooter-story are being fooled like with a magic trick that works with distractions.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

This will likely be the JFK of the modern times and we still don't have the facts

JFK was shot from multiple directions but the headshot came from the sewer in front of the car. Can't find the exact scene now because it's 3 hours long, but in this video you can find evidence at around 1:45:00 https://youtu.be/4oVpt_I9iQQ

[–] 1 pt

Spalling. Look it up.

>shot from the front and how his body armor deflected the bullet

This is a plausible explanation.

[–] 0 pt

just because this is being said doesn't make it a plausible explanation. And I looked it up but couldn't find anything that would explain it. What source convinced you?

[–] 0 pt

Years of shooting experience.

[–] 0 pt

still doesn't make it the most plausible explanation imho

[–] 1 pt

All I know is he was shot in a giant menorah so that's all I need to know what really happened.

[–] 0 pt

all I know is that I know nothing

is so much better than those weird explanations